~~NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN~~ that the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of McGrath RentCorp, a California corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the Company’s principal executive offices located at 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551, on Wednesday, June 8, 2011 at 2:00 p.m., local time. Shareholders who are unable to attend may listen to a live webcast of the Annual Meeting on the Company’s website at www.mgrc.com under the Investor Relations section. The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

~~1. To elect seven (7) directors of the Company to serve until the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified;~~

~~2. To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2011; and~~

~~3. To hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;~~

~~4. To hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of holding a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and~~

~~5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.~~

~~The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement which is attached and made a part hereof.~~

The Board of Directors of the Company has fixed the close of business on April 11, 2011 as the record date for determining the shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, please complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card using the enclosed return envelope, as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote in person if you attend the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a proxy card issued in your name from such broker, bank or other nominee.

If you hold your shares in a brokerage account, your shares will not be voted in the election of directors, the vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers or the vote on the frequency of holding a vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers unless you provide explicit instructions to your broker as to how you wish to vote your shares. Under the New York Stock Exchange rules governing discretionary voting of proxies by the exchange’s members, your broker is not permitted to vote shares with respect non-routine matters such as the election of directors, the vote on compensation or the vote on the frequency of holding a vote on compensation without voting instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of McGrath RentCorp, a California corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the Company’s principal executive offices located at 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551, on Wednesday, June 6, 2012 at 2:00 p.m., local time. Shareholders who are unable to attend may listen to a live webcast of the Annual Meeting on the Company’s website at www.mgrc.com under the Investor Relations section. The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

1. To elect seven (7) directors of the Company to serve until the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified;

2. To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2012;

3. To hold a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

4. To approve an amended and restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) to: (i) increase the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock issuable under the 2007 Plan by 1,500,000 shares; (ii) approve the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) performance criteria and award limits; (iii) permit the use of shares withheld to satisfy tax obligations for future issuance under the 2007 Plan; (iv) extend the plan term by ten years from the date of shareholder approval; and (v) make other non-substantive changes.

5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement which is attached and made a part hereof.

The Board of Directors of the Company has fixed the close of business on April 16, 2012 as the record date for determining the shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

If you hold your shares in a brokerage account, your shares will not be voted in the election of directors, the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers or the amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2007 Plan unless you provide explicit instructions to your broker as to how you wish to vote your shares. Under the New York Stock Exchange rules governing discretionary voting of proxies by the exchange’s members, your broker is not permitted to vote shares with respect to non-routine matters such as the election of directors, the vote on compensation or the amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2007 Plan without voting instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares.

This proxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”) is made available to the shareholders of McGrath RentCorp, a California corporation (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”), in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of proxies in the accompanying form for use in voting at the ~~2011~~2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, June ~~8, 2011,~~6, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., local time, at the Company’s principal executive offices located at 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The shares represented by the proxies received, properly marked, dated, executed and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting.

The Company expects to mail this Proxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy to shareholders on or about April ~~27, 2011.~~30, 2012.

The rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) require us to notify our shareholders of the availability of our proxy materials through the Internet.

Our Proxy Statement and ~~2010~~2011 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at

The following questions and answers provide important information about the Annual Meeting and this Proxy Statement:

Where are the Company’s principal executive offices located and what is the Company’s main telephone number?

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551. The Company’s main telephone number is (925) 606-9200.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that shareholders vote on these matters?

The Board of Directors believes that the election of the nominated directors, the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP, the approval on an advisory basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the ~~approval on an advisory basis of a one-year frequency of voting on the compensation~~amendment and restatement of the ~~Company’s named executive officers~~2007 Plan are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and, accordingly, recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of each of these proposals.

The SEC adopted amendments to the proxy rules that change how companies must provide proxy materials. These rules are often referred to as “Notice and Access.” Under the Notice and Access model, a company may select either of the following two options for making proxy materials available to shareholders:

Under the full set delivery option, a company delivers all proxy materials to its shareholders as it would have done prior to the change in the rules. This can be by mail or, if a shareholder has previously agreed, by e-mail. In addition to delivering proxy materials to shareholders, a company must post all proxy materials on a publicly-accessible website and provide information to shareholders about how to access that website. The Company’s proxy materials are available on the following website: https://materials.proxyvote.com/580589.

Under the notice only delivery option, a company must post all its proxy materials on a publicly accessible website. However, instead of delivering its proxy materials to shareholders, the company instead delivers a one-page notice of internet availability of proxy materials which includes, among other matters:

A company may use a single method for all its shareholders, or use full set delivery for some while adopting the notice only option for others. The Company is required to comply with these Notice and Access rules in connection with its Annual Meeting, and has elected to use the full set delivery option under the rules for all shareholders in connection with this year’s Annual Meeting.

Although the Company has elected to use the full set delivery option for the Annual Meeting, we may choose to use the notice only option in the future. By reducing the amount of materials that a company needs to print and mail, the notice only option provides an opportunity for cost savings as well as conservation of natural

resources. However, many companies that have used the notice only option have also experienced a lower participation rate—meaning that fewer shareholders voted at these companies’ annual meetings. The Company plans to continue to evaluate the ~~future~~ possible cost savings and environmental impact as well as the potential impact on shareholder participation in its consideration of the notice only option in the future.

What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?

Shareholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (“Computershare”), you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and the proxy materials were sent directly to you by the Company.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the proxy materials were forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the shareholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account.

You may vote by signing and dating each paper proxy card you received and returning it in the prepaid envelope. The enclosed proxy will be voted in accordance with the instructions thereon. Unless otherwise stated, all shares represented by such proxy will be voted as instructed. Proxies may be revoked in the manner described below.

If you received more than one proxy card, it may mean that you hold shares registered in more than one account. If you received more than one paper proxy card, sign and return each proxy card you received to ensure that all of your shares are voted. If you have any questions regarding your share information or address appearing on the paper proxy card you may call Computershare, the Company’s transfer agent, at (800) 962-4284 if you are a shareholder of record, or contact your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.”

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. You may vote again on a later date by signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. However, your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at the Annual Meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551 prior to the Annual Meeting. See “May I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?” below.

The close of business on April ~~11, 2011~~16, 2012 has been fixed as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining the holders of shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

As of the close of business on the Record Date, ~~the Company had 24,316,246~~there were 24,761,334 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The presence at the Annual Meeting of a majority of these shares of Common Stock, either in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.

Each outstanding share of Common Stock on the Record Date is entitled to one vote on each ~~matter.~~matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting. However, every shareholder voting for the election of directors may cumulate such shareholder’s votes and give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected (seven) multiplied by the number of shares held, or may distribute such shareholder’s votes on the same principle among as many candidates as the shareholder may select. However, no shareholder shall be entitled to cumulate votes for any candidate unless the candidate’s name has been placed in nomination prior to the voting and the shareholder, or any other shareholder,

has given notice at the Annual Meeting prior to the voting of the intention to cumulate such shareholder’s votes. The proxy holders are given discretionary authority, under the terms of the proxy, to cumulate votes represented by shares for which they are named in the proxy. In electing directors, the seven candidates receiving the highest number of affirmative votes shall be elected.

An automated system administered by Computershare will tabulate votes cast by proxy and Randle F. Rose, the Company’s Secretary, will act as the inspector of elections to tabulate votes cast in person at the Annual Meeting.

Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within the Company or to third parties, except:

Occasionally, shareholders provide written comments on their proxy cards, which may be forwarded to the Company’s management and the Board of Directors.

Under the General Corporation Law of the State of California, an abstaining vote and a broker “non-vote” are counted as present and are, therefore, included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. However, abstentions are not included in determining the number of shares voting on the proposals submitted to shareholders. Generally, a broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee (such as a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization) holding shares for a beneficial owner in “street name” does not vote on a particular matter because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that matter and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker “non-votes,” and shares as to which proxy authority has been withheld with respect to any matter, are not deemed to be entitled to vote for purposes of determining whether shareholders’ approval of that matter has been obtained.

With respect to Proposal No. 1 of this Proxy Statement, a plurality of the votes cast is required for the election of directors. This means that the director nominee with the most votes for a particular slot is elected for

that slot. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHELD” with respect to the election of directors. Only votes “FOR” or “WITHHELD” are counted in determining whether a plurality has been cast in favor of a director. Abstentions and broker “non-votes,” if any, will have no effect on this proposal. Brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers and other nominees holding shares for holders who have not given specific voting instructions are not permitted to vote in their discretion with respect to Proposal No. 1. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote, your broker may not vote with respect to this proposal and these votes will be counted as broker “non-votes,” as is described in “What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?” below. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as amended and restated by the Board of Directors on December 9, 2010, set forth our procedures if a director-nominee is elected, but receives a majority of “WITHHELD” votes. In an uncontested election, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHELD” from his or her election than votes “FOR” such election is required to tender his or her resignation following certification of the shareholder vote. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is required to make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to any such letter of resignation. The Board of Directors is required to take action with respect to this recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote and to disclose its decision-making process.

With respect to Proposal No. 2 of this Proxy Statement, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented and voting at the Annual Meeting is required for ratification of the independent auditors. Abstentions will have the same effect as voting against this proposal. Broker “non-votes,” if any, will have no effect on this proposal. Although certain brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers and other nominees holding shares for holders who have not given specific voting instructions are permitted to vote in their discretion with respect to Proposal No. 2, those institutions which are not governed by New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Rule 452, are not permitted to vote in their discretion with respect to such proposal. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote, and your broker is not governed by NYSE Rule 452, your broker may not vote with respect to this proposal and these votes will be counted as broker “non-votes,” as is described in “What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?” below.

With respect to Proposal No. 3 of this Proxy Statement, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented and voting at the Annual Meeting is required for approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” with respect to approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Abstentions will have the same effect as voting against this proposal. Broker “non-votes,” if any, will have no effect on this proposal. Brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers and other nominees holding shares for holders who have not been given specific voting instructions are not permitted to vote in their discretion with respect to Proposal No. 3. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote, your broker may not vote with respect to this proposal and these votes will be counted as broker “non-votes,” as is described in “What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?” below.

With respect to Proposal No. 4 of this Proxy Statement, the affirmative vote of a ~~plurality~~majority of the ~~votes cast will determine~~shares of Common Stock represented and voting at the ~~frequency of voting on the compensation~~Annual Meeting is required for approval of the ~~Company’s named executive officers that will be deemed the choice~~amendment and restatement of the ~~shareholders.~~2007 Plan. You may vote ~~for “EVERY ONE YEAR,” “EVERY TWO YEARS”~~“FOR” or ~~“EVERY THREE YEARS”~~“AGAINST” with respect to the ~~frequency of voting on the compensation~~amendment and restatement of the ~~Company’s named executive officers. Only votes cast for one of these three frequencies are counted in determining whether a plurality has been cast in favor of a particular frequency.~~2007 Plan. Abstentions ~~and broker~~will have the same effect as voting against this proposal. Broker “non-votes,” if any, will have no effect on ~~such~~this proposal. Brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers and other nominees holding shares for holders who have not given specific voting instructions are not permitted to vote in their discretion with respect to Proposal No. 4. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote, your broker may not vote with respect to this proposal and these votes will be counted as broker “non-votes,” as is described in “What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?” below.

For Shares Directly Registered in the Name of the Shareholder: If you return your signed proxy but do not indicate your voting preferences, the Company will vote on your behalf “FOR” the election of the nominated

directors, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP, “FOR” approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and ~~for~~“FOR” the ~~approval of a non-binding, advisory vote “EVERY ONE YEAR” on the compensation~~amendment and restatement of the Company’s ~~named executive officers.~~2007 Plan. If any other matter properly comes before the shareholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.

For Shares Registered in the Name of a Brokerage Firm, Bank, Broker-Dealer or Other Similar Organization: If your shares are held in street name, your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or nominee will ask you how you want your shares to be voted. If you provide voting instructions, your shares must be voted as you direct. If you do not furnish voting instructions with respect to shares registered in the name of organizations that are not governed by ~~New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”)~~NYSE Rule 452, those shares will not be voted at the meeting because such organizations do not have discretionary voting power. If you do not furnish voting instructions to brokerage firms that are governed by NYSE Rule 452, one of two things can happen, depending upon whether a proposal is “routine.” Under NYSE Rule 452, brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers and other similar organizations have discretion to cast votes on routine matters, such as the ratification of the appointment

of an independent auditor, without voting instructions from their clients. Brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers and other similar organizations are not permitted, however, to cast votes on “non-routine” matters, such as the election of directors, votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers or votes on the ~~frequency of holding a vote on the compensation~~amendment and restatement of the Company’s ~~named executive officers,~~2007 Plan, without such voting instructions.

For Shares Directly Registered in the Name of the Shareholder: Yes. However, we encourage you to vote by proxy card even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. If you wish to give a proxy to someone other than the individuals named as proxies on the enclosed proxy card, you may cross out the names appearing on the enclosed proxy card, insert the name of some other person, sign the card and give the proxy card to that person for use at the Annual Meeting.

For Shares Registered in the Name of a Brokerage Firm or Bank: Yes, but in order to do so you will first have to ask your bank, broker or other intermediary to furnish you with a legal proxy. You will need to bring the legal proxy with you to the Annual Meeting and hand it in with a signed ballot that you can request at the Annual Meeting. You will not be able to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting without a legal proxy and a signed ballot.

Your attendance at the Annual Meeting in and of itself will not automatically revoke a proxy that was submitted earlier by mail.

The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. The final voting results will be tallied by the inspector of elections and reported in a current report on Form 8-K to be filed by the Company within four business days after the end of the Annual Meeting.

The Company will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies, including the costs of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing this Proxy Statement, the proxy and any additional soliciting material furnished to shareholders. Arrangements will be made with brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial owners of ~~stock,~~our Common Stock, and these entities may be reimbursed by the Company for their expenses. Proxies may be solicited by directors, officers or employees of the Company in person or by telephone, e-mail or other means. No additional compensation will be paid to such individuals for these services.

Requirements for Shareholder Proposals to be Considered for Inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Materials. Shareholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and intended to be presented at the annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders to be held in ~~2012~~2013 must be received by the Company no later than ~~December 29, 2011~~January 1, 2013 in order to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for that meeting.

Discretionary Authority. The proxies to be solicited by the Board of Directors for the ~~2012~~2013 annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders will confer discretionary authority on the proxyholders to vote on any shareholder proposal presented at such annual meeting if the Company fails to receive notice of such proposal by March ~~13, 2012.~~15, 2013.

Some brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, or other nominees who are record holders may participate in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and their accompanying documents. This means that only one copy of the proxy materials will be sent to your household regardless of the number of shareholders who reside there. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of these documents without charge to you upon written request to McGrath RentCorp, 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551, Attn: Investor Relations. If you want to receive separate copies of our proxy materials in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy per household, you should contact your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other nominee who is a record holder, or you may contact us at the address and phone number listed above.

We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other reports with the SEC. Copies of these filings are available through our Internet website at www.mgrc.com under the Investor Relations section or the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We will furnish copies of our SEC filings (without exhibits), including our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and filed with the SEC on February ~~25, 2011~~29, 2012 (the ~~“2010~~“2011 Annual Report”), without charge to any shareholder upon written request to McGrath RentCorp, 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551, Attn: Investor Relations.

The Company’s bylaws authorize the number of directors to be not less than five (5) and not more than nine (9). The number of directors on the Board of Directors is currently fixed at seven (7). Each director serves a one-year term. The Board of Directors is currently composed of the following seven (7) directors whose terms will expire upon the election and qualification of directors at the Annual Meeting: William J. Dawson, Robert C. Hood, Dennis C. Kakures, Robert P. McGrath, M. Richard Smith, Dennis P. Stradford and Ronald H. Zech. At each annual meeting of shareholders, directors will be elected for full terms of one year to succeed those directors whose terms are expiring.

At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders will elect seven (7) directors. Messrs. Dawson, Hood, Kakures, McGrath, Smith, Stradford and Zech have each been nominated to serve a one-year term, until the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in ~~2012,~~2013, until their successors are elected or appointed and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of Messrs. Dawson, Hood, Kakures, McGrath, Smith, Stradford or Zech will be unable or unwilling to serve as a nominee or as a director if elected.

The names of the nominees and certain information about them are set forth below.


Name of Nominee	Age		Principal Occupation	Director Since		Age		Principal Occupation	Director Since
William J. Dawson		56	Chief Financial Officer of Catalyst Biosciences, Inc.		1998		57	Former Chief Financial Officer of Catalyst Biosciences, Inc.		1998

Robert C. Hood		70	Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Excite, Inc.		1999		71	Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Excite, Inc.		1999

Dennis C. Kakures		54	Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company		2003		55	Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company		2003

Robert P. McGrath		77	Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Directors of the Company		1979		78	Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Directors of the Company		1979

M. Richard Smith		63	Former Senior Vice President of Bechtel Group, Inc.		2010		64	Former Senior Vice President of Bechtel Group, Inc.		2010

Dennis P. Stradford		64	Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nomis Solutions, Inc.		2002		65	Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nomis Solutions, Inc.		2002

Ronald H. Zech		67	Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company		1989		68	Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company		1989

William J. Dawson was elected a director of the Company in 1998. Mr. Dawson isserved as Chief Financial Officer at Catalyst Biosciences, Inc., a privately-held biotechnology company ~~which he joined in March 2010.~~for two years from 2010 to 2012. He was Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer with Cerus Corporation, a publicly held biopharmaceutical company from August 2004 to April 2009. At Cerus, Mr. Dawson completed two rounds of equity financing, helped spin-off a non-strategic asset to a syndicate of venture capital firms, and guided financial aspects of the company’s commercial expansion in Europe, while building an international finance and accounting organization and leading an upgrade of the corporate accounting system, SEC reporting, and compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Prior to joining Cerus, he spent a total of 26 years in senior financial positions at companies in biotechnology, healthcare services and information technology, investment banking, energy and transportation, where he was responsible for strategic, business and financial planning, SEC reporting, investor relations, and numerous equity, debt and structured financings, mergers and acquisitions, and advisory assignments. As an investment banker, Mr. Dawson assisted in three public equity offerings for McGrath RentCorp, beginning with its initial public offering in 1984. He also serves on the board of directors of Wellington Trust Company, a subsidiary of Wellington Management Company, LLP, a private institutional ~~fund~~investment management company. With his wealth of experience in financial and strategic transactions, Mr. Dawson provides significant value to the Board of Directors. Mr. Dawson received an A.B. in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

Robert C. Hood was elected a director of the Company in 1999. Since 1999, he has been an independent investor. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Hood was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer at Excite, Inc., one of the early internet portal companies. At Excite, Mr. Hood helped guide the company through its substantial growth phase, was responsible for all financial and administrative functions, spearheaded several rounds of equity financing and helped negotiate and integrate eight acquisitions. Prior to working at Excite, Mr. Hood accumulated over thirty years of business and senior-level financial experience, in both large-scale multi-national and fast growth technology companies. This experience included SEC reporting, legal affairs, human resource administration, investor relations, large-scale information systems, controllership and internal control functions, debt and equity financing, international operations, budgeting and strategic planning, acquisitions and mergers. Company affiliations included companies engaged in equipment leasing, electronic test equipment manufacturing and financial services. With his many years of senior-level business and financial experience, Mr. Hood provides valued perspective on numerous financial, administrative and strategic issues facing public companies. Mr. Hood holds an A.B. in Economics from Bates College and an M.B.A. from The Tuck School, Dartmouth College.

Dennis C. Kakures was elected a director of the Company in 2003 and became the Chief Executive Officer of the Company in 2003. Mr. Kakures has been the President of the Company since 1995. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer, he served as Chief Operating Officer from 1989 to 2003 and Executive Vice President from 1993 to 1995. Having started his career with McGrath RentCorp in sales in 1982, and having held roles of increasing managerial responsibility over his 2729 years with the Company, Mr. Kakures provides unique insight and perspective on the Company’s business on a day-to-day basis. Mr. Kakures has been instrumental in developing and driving the strategic product and geographic expansion of the Company’s varied rental businesses since he became Chief Executive Officer in 2003. He is uniquely qualified to serve as Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board of Directors. Mr. Kakures received a B.S. in Marketing from California State University at Hayward.

Robert P. McGrath is the founder of the Company and Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Directors. He has been a director since the Company’s formation in 1979 and served as Chairman of the Board of Directors from 1988 until he elected to step down from that role in June 2009. From March 2003 to July 2004, Mr. McGrath served as Executive Chairman. From 1979 to March 2003, he also served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. He served as President from 1979 to 1994 and Chief Financial Officer from 1979 to 1993. Mr. McGrath provided the leadership to the Company that drove it from a ~~start up~~start-up to a diversified business-to-business rental company. This includes his work on a stock underwriting and secondary offerings plus several successful acquisitions. He is intimately familiar with the business, structure, history and culture of the Company and offers insights that only this experience can provide. Mr. McGrath holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame.

M. Richard Smith was elected a director of the Company in 2010. Mr. Smith served as Senior Vice President of Bechtel Group, Inc. and President of its ~~Fossil Power~~fossil power business unit, where he managed Bechtel’s global fossil power engineering and construction activities, until 2007. His service in this position culminated a 26-year career with Bechtel. During that tenure, he also served as Chief Executive Officer of Intergen, a joint venture between Shell and Bechtel. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Smith ~~was~~served at a Bechtel/PG&E joint venture and at PG&E Corporation where he was responsible for all corporate development activities. Mr. Smith also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of ~~Insituform Technologies, Inc~~Aegion Corporation (NASDAQ:~~INSU)~~AEGN), a leading provider of pipeline rehabilitation products and services, USEC Inc. (NYSE:USU), a major supplier of enriched uranium fuel for commercial nuclear power plants, and Sithe Global Power, LLC, an international power development ~~company, and SkyFuel, Inc., a solar thermal power technology provider.~~company. With his extensive experience serving as a board member and in executive management roles for a number of public companies, Mr. Smith brings to the Board of Directors a valuable perspective on issues facing public companies as well as considerable guidance on corporate development, business operations and the energy industry. Mr. Smith received a ~~Bachelor of Science~~B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Auburn University, a ~~Master of Science~~M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University and a ~~Master of Business Administration~~M.B.A. from Golden Gate University.

Dennis P. Stradford was elected a director of the Company in 2002. Mr. Stradford joined Nomis Solutions, Inc., a provider of price optimization solutions to the financial services industry, as its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2004. He served as Chief Executive Officer until July 2009 and Chairman until February 2010. Mr. Stradford was the Chief Executive Officer of CascadeWorks, Inc., a provider of e-procurement

software to Fortune 1000 companies, from 2000 to 2003. From 1998 to 2000, he was Chief Executive Officer of SupplyBase, Inc. a provider of web-based supply-chain management software and services. From 1985 to 1997, Mr. Stradford was with Flextronics International, Ltd., a publicly traded company, and served as its Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing. He previously held executive and sales positions with Zehntel, Inc. and International Business Machines Corp. With his wealth of experience in senior management, Mr. Stradford brings to the Board of Directors considerable expertise on strategic, operational, and sales and marketing issues. Mr. Stradford holds a B.A. from San Jose State University and an M.A., M. Div. from St. Patrick’s University.

Ronald H. Zech was elected a director of the Company in 1989 and elected to the position of non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors in June 2009. He is also Chairman of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and a member of our Audit Committee. He retired in 2005 as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GATX Corporation, a NYSE listed company and leading provider of lease financing and related services to customers operating rail, marine, and other targeted assets. Mr. Zech was elected Chairman of GATX Corporation in April 1996, Chief Executive Officer in January 1996, and President in July 1994. Prior to that time he had served both as President and Chief Financial Officer of GATX Capital Corporation and as an officer with a major international bank. He also serves on the board of The PMI Group, a leading provider of mortgage insurance, where he is Vice Chair of both the Compensation and Governance and Nominating Committees. His experiences in these senior management and financial roles have included a wide range of activities associated with the management of a public company. Accordingly, he brings to the Board of Directors a valued perspective on many issues faced by the Company. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Valparaiso University and an M.B.A. from the University of Wisconsin.

The nominees will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker “non-votes,” if any, will not be counted toward the nominees’ total. However, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, in an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHELD” from his or her election than votes “FOR” such election (a “Majority Withheld Vote”) is required to tender his or her resignation following certification of the shareholder vote.

~~The~~If a nominee for director is required to tender his or her resignation pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, then the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee shall consider the tendered resignation ~~offer~~ and recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept it. The Board of Directors will act on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote. The Board of Directors will promptly disclose ~~their~~its decision whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation offer (and the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable) in a current report on Form 8-K ~~furnished to~~filed by the Company with the SEC.

Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this provision shall not participate in the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommendation or the Board of Directors’ action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer.

If all members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee receive a Majority Withheld Vote at the same election, then the independent directors who did not receive a Majority Withheld Vote shall appoint a committee among themselves to consider the resignation offers and recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept them; provided, however, that if the only directors who did not receive a Majority Withheld Vote in the same election constitute three or fewer directors, then all directors may participate in the action regarding whether to accept the resignation offers.

Each nominee elected as a director will continue in office until his or her successor has been elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or retirement.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the executive officers and directors of the Company as of March 31, ~~2011:~~2012:

Robert P. McGrath, Dennis C. Kakures, William J. Dawson, Robert C. Hood, M. Richard Smith, Dennis P. Stradford and Ronald H. Zech are nominees to the Board of Directors and their descriptions appear under“Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors—Nominees.”

Joseph F. Hanna was appointed Chief Operating Officer in June 2007. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President of Operations of the Company starting in January 2005, and he served as Vice President of Operations since joining the Company in 2003. Mr. Hanna has extensive sales and operations experience, including 12 years at SMC Corporation of America (a subsidiary of SMC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) where he served in various leadership positions. His prior experience also includes serving as an officer in the United States Army. Mr. Hanna received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York.

Keith E. Pratt was appointed Senior Vice President of the Company in June 2007. He joined the Company in January 2006 as Vice President and was appointed Chief Financial Officer in March 2006. ~~Most recently,~~Prior to joining the Company, he was most recently with Advanced Fibre Communications (AFC), a public telecommunications equipment company in Petaluma, California, where he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Pratt served as Chief Financial Officer from 1999 until AFC was acquired by Tellabs, Inc. at the end of 2004. He also served as

Director of Corporate Development at AFC from 1997 to 1999 prior to becoming Chief Financial Officer. Prior to Mr. Pratt joining AFC, he served as Director, Strategy & Business Development Group at Pacific Telesis Group, Inc. from 1995 to 1997. Mr. Pratt has an undergraduate degree from Cambridge University in Production Engineering and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.

Randle F. Rose was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company in June 2007. He joined the Company in 1997 as its Vice President of Administration and was elected Secretary of the Company in 1999. Prior to joining the Company, he served in a variety of senior finance and general management roles with Silicon Valley real estate development companies. Mr. Rose received a B.S. in Finance from San Jose State University.

David M. Whitney joined the Company as its Corporate Controller in 2000 and was elected Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer in March 2006. Previously he was Manager of Regional Accounting for The Permanente Medical Group in Oakland, California. Mr. Whitney holds a B.S. in Accounting from California State University at Hayward, and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Kay Dashnerjoined the Company in 2005 as the Director of Human Resources and was promoted to Vice President, Human Resources in June 2008. Previously, she held various HR leadership positions in the retail, insurance and software industries, most recently at NetSuite from April 2005 to July 2005 and BMC Software, Inc. from March 1999 to April 2005. Ms. Dashner graduated from Santa Clara University with a B.S. in Management.

~~Richard G. Brown~~Philip B. Hawkins was appointed Vice President ~~of the Company~~ and Division Manager of Mobile Modular in ~~January 2005.~~November 2011. He previously served as Division Manager of the Company’s modular division from July 2002 to January 2005. He joined the Company in 1992 and has served in both sales and branch management positions for the Company’s modular division. He received a B.A. in Speech Communication from California State University, Northridge and an M.B.A. from Azusa Pacific University.

~~Philip B. Hawkins~~ ~~was appointed~~ Vice President ~~of the Company~~ and Division Manager of TRS-RenTelco infrom June ~~2007. He previously served as~~2007 to November 2011 and also held the role of Manager, Corporate Financial Planning and Analysis from June 2004 to June 2007. Mr. Hawkins was a Senior Business Analyst for Technology Rentals and Services (TRS), an electronics equipment rental division of CIT Technologies Corporation from December 2003 until TRS was acquired by the Company in June 2004. He previously served as Director of Portfolio Management and held other leadership roles with Dell Financial Services from April 1999 to December 2003. Mr. Hawkins received B.S. degrees in Accounting, Finance and Computer Information Systems from Arizona State University.

John P. Skenesky was appointed Vice President and Division Manager of TRS-RenTelco in November 2011. He previously served as the division’s Director of Sales and Product Management from June 2007 to November 2011 and Director of Operations and Product Management from June 2004 to June 2007. Mr. Skenesky joined the Company in 1995 and served in branch management and sales roles for the RenTelco division. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Skenesky served in lab and product management roles at Genstar Rentals from 1991 to 1994. He also served in the United States Navy from 1984 to 1990 as an electronics technician on submarines. Mr. Skenesky received an M.B.A. from Texas Christian University in 2007.

Steven H. Adler was appointed President of Adler Tank Rentals, LLC in December 2008. In 1998, Mr. Adler founded Adler Tank Rentals, LLC which assets were acquired by the Company in December 2008. He also founded Adler Industrial Services, a roof vacuum services business, in 1993, and Sabre Manufacturing, which manufactures liquid and solid containment products, in 2005. Mr. Adler received a B.S. in Business Administration from Alfred University in New York, and ~~a Masters Degree~~an M.B.A. in International Business from Thunderbird School of Global Management in Arizona.

Kristina VanTreasewas appointed Vice President of the Company and Division Manager of Mobile Modular Portable Storage in June 2009. She previously served as Director of Corporate Development from July 2007 to June 2009. She joined the Company in 1992 and has served in corporate management roles as well as sales and management positions for the Company’s TRS-RenTelco division. Ms. VanTrease received a B.S. ~~Degree~~ in Business Administration from San Jose State University.

Each executive officer of the Company serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors has determined that the six non-employee directors on the Board of Directors, consisting of Messrs. Dawson, Hood, McGrath, Smith, Stradford, and Zech are “independent” as defined in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, regulations of the SEC ~~(“SEC regulations”)~~ and any other laws applicable to the Company. Mr. Kakures, as an executive officer of the Company, is not considered independent. In making these determinations, our Board of Directors considered transactions and relationships between each director and his or her immediate family and the Company and our subsidiaries, including those reported in the section below captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were material and, therefore, inconsistent with a determination that such director is independent. As a result of this review, the Board of Directors affirmatively determined, based on its understanding of such transactions and relationships, that the six non-employee directors are independent of the Company and, therefore, a majority of the members of our Board of Directors is independent, under the applicable listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market.

At last year’s annual meeting, approximately ~~16.6~~22 percent of shareholders voted “WITHHOLD” for Mr. ~~McGrath.~~McGrath (which percentage did not represent a Majority Withheld Vote). The Company believes that these votes were likely cast as a result of, and in accordance with, a report by Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), which included a recommendation of a “WITHHOLD” vote for Mr. McGrath. This recommendation was based on ISS’ determination that Mr. McGrath was an “affiliated outside director” because he is the founder of the Company and formerly served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer until March 2003. It is ISS’ policy that affiliated outsiders should not serve on the Company’s independent board committees. However, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. McGrath is “independent” as defined in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market and the regulations of the SEC and the Company believes that he continues to contribute significant value as a member of the Audit and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees.

Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of six independent directors and one management director. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines state that the Board of Directors should remain free to decide whether the Chairman and CEO positions should be held by the same person. This allows the Board of Directors to determine the best arrangement for the Company and its shareholders, given changing circumstances of the Company and the composition of the Board of Directors. Currently the positions are separated. Mr. Zech, our non-executive chairman, has extensive knowledge and experience in a similarly complex industry from his 2829 years with GATX, has a significant understanding of the Company based on his 2123 years on the Board of Directors, and has a solid relationship with the other directors and management. Mr. Kakures, our Chief Executive Officer, is a seasoned leader with over 29 years of management and operational experience in the Company, clearly understands and drives its strategic growth, and interacts well with Mr. Zech and the other directors. We believe our current leadership structure is optimal at this time.

During ~~2010,~~2011, the Board of Directors met nine times. No director attended fewer than 75% of ~~the aggregate of~~ either (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors held ~~during the period for which he was a director,~~in 2011, or (ii) the total number of ~~committee~~ meetings of the committees of the Board of Directors held in ~~2010~~2011 on which he served. All seven directors attended the ~~2010 annual meeting of shareholders, with the exception of Mr. Smith, who was elected to the Board of Directors after the 2010~~2011 annual meeting of shareholders. All directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. The standing committees of the Board of Directors currently ~~include~~consist of the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

The Compensation Committee held ~~four~~three meetings in ~~2010.~~2011. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Dawson, Hood, Smith and Stradford; Mr. Dawson serves as its Chairman. The Board of

Directors has determined that all current members of the Compensation Committee are “independent” as defined in the listing

standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, SEC regulations and any other laws applicable to the Company. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that all current members of the Compensation Committee ~~shall~~ qualify as “non-employee directors” within the meaning of SEC Rule 16b-3 as promulgated under the Exchange Act, and as “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

The Board of Directors adopted and approved a charter for the Compensation Committee, which was most recently amended and restated on December 9, 2010. A copy of this charter is posted on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investor Relations section. The functions of the Compensation Committee, which are discussed in detail in its charter, are to (a) evaluate executive officer and director compensation policies, goals, plans and programs; (b) determine the cash and non-cash compensation of the executive officers of the Company; (c) review and administer the Company’s equity-based and other incentive compensation plans for employees; (d) evaluate the performance of the Company’s executive officers; and (e) produce any reports required by the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

Compensation decisions for the executive officers of the Company are made by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee directs the Chief Executive Officer to develop the incentive compensation guidelines for the other executive officers and to determine the incentive compensation bonuses for each of the other executive officers. Compensation decisions for directors are made by the Board of Directors after recommendations by the Compensation Committee.

The Audit Committee held five meetings in ~~2010.~~2011. The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Dawson, Hood, McGrath and Zech; Mr. Hood serves as its Chairman. After considering transactions and relationships between each member of the Audit Committee or his immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries and reviewing the qualifications of the members of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors has determined that all current members of the Audit Committee are “independent,” as defined in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, SEC regulations and any other laws applicable to the Company. The Board of Directors has also determined that all current members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and have the requisite financial sophistication as required by the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Furthermore, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Dawson, Hood, McGrath and Zech each qualify as an Audit Committee financial expert, as defined by the applicable SEC rules, ~~of the Exchange Act,~~ pursuant to the fact that, among other things, Mr. Hood is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Excite, Inc., Mr. Dawson is the Chief Financial Officer of Catalyst Biosciences, Inc., Mr. McGrath was former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mr. Zech is the former Chief Executive Officer of GATX Corporation, and in those respective capacities each has acquired the relevant experience and expertise and has the attributes set forth in the applicable rules as being required for an Audit Committee financial expert.

The Board of Directors adopted and approved a charter for the Audit Committee, which was most recently amended and restated on December 9, 2010. A copy of this charter is posted on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investor Relations section. The functions of the Audit Committee, which are discussed in detail in its charter, are to (a) oversee the engagement, replacement, compensation, qualification, independence and performance of the Company’s independent auditors; (b) oversee the conduct of the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the integrity of the Company’s audited financial statements and other financial reports; (c) oversee the performance of the Company’s internal accounting, financial and disclosure controls function; and (d) oversee the Company’s compliance with its policies and other legal requirements as such compliance relates to the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also established procedures for (a) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (b) the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Audit Committee also

oversees the preparation of a report for inclusion in our annual proxy statements and is charged with the other duties and responsibilities listed in its charter. The Audit Committee’s report is included in this Proxy Statement on page ~~47.~~45. The Audit Committee is a separately designated standing audit committee as defined in Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee held ~~one meeting~~two meetings in ~~2010.~~2011. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee consists of Messrs. Stradford, McGrath, Smith ~~Stradford,~~ and Zech; Mr. Zech serves as its Chairman. Our Board of Directors has determined that all current members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are “independent,” as defined in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, SEC regulations and any other laws applicable to the Company.

The Board of Directors adopted and approved a charter for the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which was most recently amended and restated on December ~~9, 2010.~~6, 2011. A copy of this charter is posted on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investor Relations section. The functions of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which are discussed in detail in its charter, are to assist the Board of Directors in all matters relating to (a) the establishment, implementation and monitoring of policies and processes regarding the recruitment and nomination of candidates to the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors; (b) the review and making of recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the composition and structure of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors; (c) the development, evaluation and monitoring of the Company’s corporate governance processes and principles; (d) the development and implementation of, and monitoring of compliance with, the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and making recommendations to the Board of Directors of revisions to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics from time to time as appropriate; and (e) the administration of the Board of Directors’ annual self-evaluation process and the sharing of the results thereof with the Board of Directors for discussion and deliberation.

While Company management is primarily responsible for managing risk, the Board of Directors and each of its committees plays a role in overseeing the Company’s risk management practices. The full Board of Directors is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, and it discharges this responsibility by, among other things, receiving regular reports from Company management concerning the Company’s business and the material risks facing the Company. Each of the Board’s committees also plays a role in risk oversight as follows:

Audit Committee. Under its charter, the Audit Committee plays a key role in the Board of Directors’ risk oversight process. The Audit Committee’s duties include discussing the Company’s guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management with Company management and the Company’s independent auditors. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports from Company management and discusses with management the steps taken to monitor and control risk exposures. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews all of the Company’s quarterly financial reports, including any disclosure therein of risk factors affecting the Company and its businesses. The Audit Committee regularly receives reports from, among others, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, and its ~~Compliance Officer.~~compliance officer. The Audit Committee provides regular reports to the full Board of Directors on its risk oversight activities and any issues identified.

Compensation Committee. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee reviews with its independent compensation consultant and management, as appropriate, the Company’s compensation plans, policies and practices. The Compensation Committee also sets performance goals under the Company’s annual bonus and long-term incentive plans. In setting the performance targets and overseeing the Company’s compensation plans, policies and practices, the Compensation Committee considers the risks that may be created and whether any

such risks are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company. The Compensation

Committee considers the overall mix of compensation for all employees as well as the various risk control and mitigation features of its compensation plans, including appropriate performance measures and targets and incentive plan payout maximums. The Compensation Committee provides regular reports to the full Board of Directors on the Company’s compensation plans, policies and practices and the Compensation Committee’s oversight of compensation-related risks.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Under its charter, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for, among other things, ~~for~~ developing and recommending to the Board of Directors a set of effective corporate governance guidelines and procedures designed to assure compliance with applicable governance standards. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee provides regular reports to the Board of Directors.

Through the activities of the Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees, as well as the full Board of Directors’ interactions with management concerning the Company’s business and the material risks that may impact the Company, the independent directors on the Board of Directors are able to monitor the Company’s risk management process and offer critical insights to Company management.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider for nomination all bona fide candidates proposed by management or shareholders and will nominate directors that it believes will serve the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Candidates must have the education, business or organizational experience and skills that will enable them to excel in carrying out their responsibilities on the Board of Directors. Candidates must possess and have demonstrated in professional ~~endeavor~~endeavors the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term best interests of shareholders. Further, candidates must have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment, and be willing and able to challenge management in a constructive manner. Candidates will also be judged on their ability to work in a collegial manner with a sense of common purpose, energy, industry knowledge, business sense and trust with other members of the Board of Directors and management, as one group acting in unison to solve difficult problems as they may arise. The candidate’s specific knowledge of the Company, its markets, and its strategy will also be considered. When evaluating candidates, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the diversity of the backgrounds, experience and skills of the current directors on the Board of Directors, including their gender, age, ethnic and cultural backgrounds, the long-term needs of the Company based on its strategic direction and responsible succession planning for all Board positions, and selects the candidates who will provide the most value to the Board of Directors, management and shareholders. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee monitors its assessment of diversity as part of the annual self-evaluation process.

The Board of Directors’ recommendations for inclusion in the slate of directors at an annual or special meeting of shareholders, or for appointment by the Board of Directors to fill a vacancy, are based on its determination, after reviewing recommendations from the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, as to the suitability of each recommended individual.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will apply its director candidate selection criteria described above, including a director’s past contributions to the Board of Directors, prior to recommending a director for re-election to another term. Directors may not be re-nominated annually as a matter of course. Once the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee evaluations are completed and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has considered all other potential director candidates, it recommends the best slate of candidates for approval by the full Board of Directors.

Generally, once a need to add a new member to the Board of Directors is identified, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will initiate a search by working with staff support, seeking input from members of the Board of Directors and senior management and hiring a consultant or search firm, if necessary. After a slate of possible candidates is identified, certain members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, other members of the Board of Directors and senior management have the opportunity to interview the prospective candidate(s). The remaining members of the Board of Directors who do not interview the prospective candidate(s) are kept informed. After completing its selection process, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee ultimately determines and recommends the best candidate(s) for approval by the full Board of Directors.

A description of the procedure to be followed by security holders in submitting director recommendations is set forth in “Shareholder Recommendations for Membership on our Board of Directors” below. The director candidate selection criteria will be equally applied to both continuing directors and shareholder-submitted director candidates.

The Compensation Committee reviews director compensation every two years. In October ~~2008,~~2010, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia, Inc., an independent compensation consulting firm (“Compensia”), to conduct a review of its ~~2009-2010~~2011-2012 total compensation program for its non-employee directors. Compensia provided an analysis with relevant market data and alternatives to consider when making compensation decisions for the non-employee directors. The analysis compared each element of total compensation against a peer group of publicly-traded companies against which we compete in recruiting qualified managers and directors, and for shareholder investment. These companies consisted of a combination of primarily technology companies of comparable size based in the San Francisco Bay Area, and national rental, leasing and equipment finance ~~companies.~~companies, which are listed in“Compensation Consultant and Peer Group Selection”on page 22 of this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee generally sets the total compensation for non-employee directors at or slightly above the median (the 50^thpercentile) of compensation paid to non-employee directors of similarly situated peer group companies. The ~~2010~~2011 and 2012 compensation described below was approved by the Board of Directors based on Compensia’s analysis and recommendations of the Compensation Committee.

For the year ended December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, each non-employee director of the Company was compensated for his services as a director with an annual retainer of $34,000. In addition to the annual retainers, the Chairs of the Board of Directors, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee received an additional annual retainer of $20,000, $18,000, ~~$9,000~~$9,500 and ~~$5,000~~$7,500 respectively. Each other member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee received an annual retainer of $8,000, ~~$4,000~~$5,000 and ~~$2,000~~$4,000 respectively. Messrs. Dawson, Hood, McGrath, Smith, Stradford and Zech received ~~$51,000, $56,000, $44,000, $40,000~~$51,500, $57,000, $46,000, $43,000, $43,000 and ~~$67,000~~$69,500 respectively, for each of their services as a director of the Company during ~~2010. Mr. Smith received $17,300 for his prorated service as a director of the Company after his appointment to the Board of Directors during the second half of 2010.~~2011. All directors, including those who are executive officers or employees of the Company, were reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with attending Board of Directors or ~~Committee~~committee meetings.

In October 2010, consistent with the compensation review schedule every two years for non-employee directors, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia to conduct a review of its 2011-2012 total compensation program for its non-employee directors. This analysis included an updated peer group of publicly-traded companies, which are listed in~~“Compensation Consultant and Peer Group Selection”on page 22 of this Proxy Statement. The 2011 compensation described below was approved by the Board of Directors based on Compensia’s analysis and recommendations of the Compensation Committee.~~

For fiscal year ~~2011,~~2012, each director who is not also an executive officer or employee of the Company, other than the Chairman of the Board of Directors, will receive an annual retainer of $34,000. In addition to the annual

retainers, the Chairs of the Board of Directors, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will receive an additional annual retainer of $20,000, $18,000, $9,500 and $7,500 respectively. Each other member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee who is not an employee of the Company will receive an annual retainer of $8,000, $5,000 and $4,000 respectively. These annual retainers will be included in the 2012 Director Compensation Table in next year’s proxy statement.

In addition to cash compensation, each of the non-employee directors of the Company has historically received an annual equity grant. On February 2, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted an equity granting methodology (part of the 2007 ~~Stock Incentive Plan, the (“2007 Plan”)~~Plan) whereby there is one annual equity grant date, which is the date when the blackout window opens after the year-end earnings are released. All designated non-employee directors, executive officers and employees are eligible to receive an equity grant on the annual equity grant date with an exercise price (for stock options or stock appreciation ~~rights)~~rights (“SARs”)), or grant price (for restricted stock units (“RSUs”)), equal to the NASDAQ Stock Market close price on that day.

As reflected in the table below, for 2010, based on Compensia’s analysis, the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and consistent with our equity granting policy, on February 26, 2010, the Board of Directors granted each of Messrs. Dawson, Hood, McGrath, Stradford and Zech RSUs under the 2007 Plan for 3,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with a vesting date of April 1, 2011. Each of these grants represented an equivalent total equity compensation of $71,760 based on the NASDAQ Stock Market close price of $23.92 on February 26, 2010. Mr. Smith joined our Board of Directors on July 26, 2010, and received an initial grant of RSUs on August 9, 2010, for 4,200 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with a five-year vesting schedule beginning August 9, 2011. This grant represented an equivalent total equity compensation of $98,868 based on the NASDAQ Stock Market close price of $23.54 on August 9, 2010 (which was the first day the blackout window opened after he joined the Board). The Board of Directors believes equity grants of RSUs best align the interests of non-employee directors and shareholders.

In 2011, based on Compensia’s analysis, the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and consistent with our equity granting policy, on February 25, 2011, the Board of Directors granted each ~~non-employee director~~of Messrs. Dawson, Hood, McGrath, Smith, Stradford and Zech RSUs under the 2007 Plan for 2,300 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with a vesting date of April 1, 2012. Each of these grants represented an equivalent total equity compensation of $64,377 based on the NASDAQ Stock Market close price of $27.99 on February 25, 2011 (the total equity compensation values can fluctuate slightly each year due to rounding). The Board of Directors believes equity grants of RSUs best align the interests of non-employee directors and shareholders.

Based on Compensia’s analysis, the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and consistent with our equity granting policy, on March 2, 2012, the Board of Directors granted each non-employee director RSUs under the 2007 Plan for 2,100 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with a vesting date of April 1, 2013. Each of these grants represented an equivalent total equity compensation of $65,835 based on the NASDAQ Stock Market close price of $31.35 on March 2, 2012 (the total equity compensation values can fluctuate slightly each year due to rounding). These ~~2011~~2012 RSU grants will be included in the ~~2011~~2012 Director Compensation Table in next year’s proxy statement.

The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to its directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010.~~2011.


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		All Other Compensation ($)(2)		Total ($)		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		All Other Compensation ($)(2)		Total ($)
William J. Dawson	$	51,000	$	71,760	$	0	$	122,760	$	51,500	$	64,377	$	0	$	115,877

Robert C. Hood	$	56,000	$	71,760	$	0	$	127,760	$	57,000	$	64,377	$	0	$	121,377

Dennis C. Kakures								(3)								(3)

Robert P. McGrath	$	44,000	$	71,760	$	5,690	$	121,450	$	46,000	$	64,377	$	5,619	$	115,996

M. Richard Smith	$	17,300	$	98,868	$	0	$	116,168	$	43,000	$	64,377	$	0	$	107,377

Dennis P. Stradford	$	40,000	$	71,760	$	0	$	111,760	$	43,000	$	64,377	$	0	$	107,377

Ronald H. Zech	$	67,000	$	71,760	$	0	$	138,760	$	69,500	$	64,377	$	0	$	133,877

The Board of Directors believes that, in order to align the interests of directors and shareholders, directors should have a significant financial (equity) stake in the Company. Each director has a target ownership level of 5,000 shares of Common Stock to be achieved by each director within five years of joining the Board of Directors or as soon thereafter as practicable. In evaluating whether the Common Stock value ownership guideline has been met, all Common Stock owned and 50% of the value (market price less ~~strike~~stock price) of all vested unexercised stock options is considered. As of March 31, ~~2011,~~2012, all directors were in compliance with the stock ownership requirements, with the exception of Mr. Smith, who joined the Board in 2010 and has five years after that date to accumulate 5,000 ~~shares.~~shares of Common Stock.

~~Although the~~The volatility in the global economic environment over the past ~~two~~few years has presented many challenges for ~~our Company, in 2010~~McGrath RentCorp. Despite these headwinds, we ~~were able~~continued to ~~greatly improve~~execute on our product and geographic diversification ~~and invest in significant~~plans through new rental ~~assets,~~product investment and entering new markets, while maintaining a strong balance sheet. We believe the Company is ~~well positioned~~well-positioned to execute on our long-term strategic objectives ~~over~~in the ~~next several years.~~future.

In late ~~2009,~~2010, the Board of Directors approved a ~~2010~~2011 Business Plan that reflected the expectations for the Company’s financial performance in ~~2010.~~2011. The ~~2010~~2011 pre-tax income goal was set at ~~$53,035,000.~~$63,739,000. The actual pre-tax income achieved in ~~2010~~2011 was ~~$59,050,000,~~$81,058,000, which was ~~111%~~127% of the goal. This success was due primarily to returns on continued investment in, ~~part to many difficult decisions made during~~and expansion of, Adler Tank Rentals, as well as the ~~past two years to reduce expenses~~strength of TRS-RenTelco’s industry leadership position and ~~to prudently invest in areas of the Company that would enhance long-term shareholder value.~~healthy test equipment market conditions.

In 2009 and 2010, base salaries for executive officers were frozen at 2008 levels and cash ~~bonus~~bonuses and equity compensation opportunity levels were each reduced by 25%. These reductions in remuneration ~~opportunity reductions~~ were among a number of austerity measures implemented by the Company in 2009 and 2010 to address the impact of the ~~economic and financial downturn of the preceding two years.~~Great Recession. Based on a more promising 2011 outlook, the Compensation Committee engaged its compensation consultant Compensia to ~~refresh~~update the Company’s compensation peer group and to review the 2011 compensation program for its executive officers. As a ~~consequence~~result of this ~~effort,~~review, the Compensation Committee approved modest base salary increases for 2011, restored full cash bonus opportunity levels and ~~shifted them more toward~~tied a greater portion of the potential cash bonus to be earned by each executive officer to the financial performance ~~metrics,~~of the Company, and ~~also~~fully restored equity ~~compensation~~grant opportunity levels, ~~and aligned them~~all based on alignment with peer group companies. For 2012, the Compensation Committee did not engage Compensia to perform a full compensation peer group and compensation review; however, the Compensation Committee approved executive officer base salary increases for 2012 consistent with Compensia’s guidance on relevant market data.

In 2011, a new ~~profitability~~cost control metric was added to our compensation program, which measures sales, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of rental revenue. Also, division executive officers’ three-year equity target was shifted from ~~cumulative EPS to~~a three-year cumulative ~~EBIT~~earnings per share (“EPS”) target to a three-year cumulative earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) target, in each case tied to the performance of their ~~divisions, allowing~~respective divisions. This divisional target allows divisional leaders to be measured in areas over which they have more direct control and responsibility.

Also in 2011, the Company adopted a 10% holdback provision to executive officers’ RSU equity grant settlements to facilitate earlier achievement of stock ownership under the Company’s stock ownership guidelines. The Company also adopted a clawback policy requiring current and former executive officers to reimburse any excess value received if the Company is required to restate its financial statements.

We believe these ~~remuneration~~ modifications ~~enhance~~to our compensation practices have enhanced our corporate governance and executive compensation policies to the benefit of our shareholders. We also would like to acknowledge the hard work by the Company’s executive team and all employees during a particularly difficult ~~two~~three years. We have stronger organizational bench strength than ever before and a more robust succession plan in place for key leaders throughout the Company.

The purpose of the Company’s executive compensation program is to attract and retain exceptional talent and reward performance ~~align~~by establishing measurable objectives to drive future performance, thus aligning our executive officers’ interests with those of our ~~shareholders and establish measurable objectives to drive future performance.~~shareholders. We believe the most effective compensation program is one that is designed to reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals of the Company. Our primary objective is to align our executive officers’ interests with the interests of our shareholders

by rewarding achievement of established goals that contribute to increased long-term shareholder value. ~~In structuring our executive compensation program, we set the compensation of our executive officers to be competitive relative to~~

~~the compensation paid to similarly situated executives of our peer group companies and the broader general market. In addition,~~To that end, part of our executive officers’ compensation is directly tied to identifiable, objective goals by which performance can be measured. In addition, in structuring our executive compensation program, we set the compensation of our executive officers to be competitive relative to the compensation paid to similarly situated executives of our peer group companies and the broader general market.

As part of designing and implementing the compensation programs for all employees, the Company considers the risks that may be created and whether any such risks may have an adverse impact on the Company, and whether, overall, the Company’s compensation programs are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company. In making this determination, the Company considers the specific design of each element of compensation and the overall mix of compensation for employees, as well as the various risk control and mitigation features of our compensation plans, including appropriate performance measures and targets and incentive plan payout maximums.

We conducted our first advisory vote on executive compensation last year at our 2011 annual meeting of shareholders (the “2011 Annual Meeting”). This vote was non-binding on the Company, its Board of Directors or Compensation Committee; however, we believe that it is important for our shareholders to have an opportunity to vote on executive compensation on an annual basis. The advisory vote provides shareholders with the opportunity to express their views regarding our executive compensation philosophy, policies, programs, and decisions, as disclosed in our proxy statement for the applicable year. Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders, and to the extent there is any significant vote against our compensation practices for executive officers, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and assess whether any actions will be taken. In addition to our annual advisory votes on executive compensation, we are committed to ongoing engagement with our shareholders on executive compensation and corporate governance issues. These dialogue opportunities take place throughout the year through meetings, telephone calls and correspondence involving our senior management, directors and representatives of our shareholders.

At the 2011 Annual Meeting, more than 98% of the shares of Common Stock represented and voting on the advisory vote on executive compensation proposal (Proposal 3) were in favor of our named executive officer compensation as disclosed in our 2011 proxy statement. The Board of Directors and Compensation Committee reviewed these final vote results and determined that given the significant level of support, the changes to our executive compensation policies and decisions discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis were appropriate to achieve our objectives.

We have determined that our shareholders should vote on a say-on-pay proposal each year, consistent with the preference expressed by our shareholders at the 2011 Annual Meeting. Accordingly, our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 3 at the Annual Meeting. For more information, see “Proposal 3—Non-Binding Advisory Vote To Approve the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers” in this Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee (for purposes of this analysis, the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors has the responsibility for establishing, implementing and continually monitoring the compensation of ~~its~~the Company’s executive officers. The Committee ~~oversaw~~oversees and ~~approved~~approves the design of the executive compensation program to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable, competitive, and is aligned with the goals and objectives of the Company. For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the principal components of compensation for executive officers were:

~~2. Non-equity annual performance-based incentive compensation (“Annual Bonus”);~~

The Committee determined that these four elements, with a significant percentage of total compensation allocated to “at-risk” performance-based incentives, best align the interests of our executive officers with our shareholders and ~~achieves~~achieve our overall goals for executive compensation. The Annual Bonus rewards achievement of annual incentive goals and the long-term equity incentive compensation rewards achievement of long-term growth in shareholder value and sustained financial health of the Company. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation. Rather, the Committee reviews relevant market compensation data from its compensation consultant and other sources, and uses its judgment to determine the appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation on an annual basis.

To ensure that our executive compensation is competitive, the Committee directly engaged Compensia to provide information to assist in determining the total compensation program for its executive officers.

In ~~December 2008,~~November 2010, Compensia provided an analysis with relevant market data and alternatives to consider when making compensation decisions for our non-employee directors and executive officers. The analysis compared each element of total compensation against a peer group of publicly-traded companies. The Committee used this peer group in ~~2009 and 2010~~2011 for purposes of assessing our total compensation program. Accordingly, we refer to this peer group ~~collectively~~ as the ~~“2010~~“2011 Compensation Peer Group.” We believe that the ~~2010~~2011 Compensation Peer Group consisted of companies against which we competed for recruiting qualified managers and directors and for shareholder investment. These companies consisted of a combination of primarily technology companies of comparable size based in the San Francisco Bay Area, business services companies, and national rental, leasing and equipment finance companies.

As discussed above, the Company’s austerity measures for 2009 and 2010 mentioned included salary freezes, and a 25% reduction for each executive’s targeted Annual Bonus and equity compensation. These remuneration opportunity reductions may have resulted in 2009 and 2010 total compensation that was below the 50th percentile of compensation paid to similarly situated executives of the companies in the 2010 Compensation Peer Group.

In November 2010, at the direction of the Committee, Compensia revised the Compensation Peer Group for its review of 2011 total compensation for the non-employee directors and executive officers. Companies that no longer appeared comparable based on our peer group selection criteria were deleted from the 2010 Compensation Peer Group and were replaced with companies that better met our criteria. Overall, the number of peer companies decreased from 27 to 22 from the 2010 Compensation Peer Group to the 2011 Compensation Peer Group. However, the Compensation Committee believes that there are still a sufficient number of companies to determine competitive market practices.

Because the Company is headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area, the Bay Area companies were pooled with the business services companies and the national industry comparables to better approximate the competitive recruiting and retention environment influencing compensation levels for each executive officer. In addition to the 2011 Compensation Peer Group, other compensation data sources that were consulted included the 2010 Radford Executive Survey, 2010 Mercer Executive Benchmark Survey, and the 2010/2011 Towers Watson Survey.

The Committee generally targets the total compensation for executive officers at or slightly above the median (the ~~50th~~50th percentile) of compensation paid to similarly situated executives of the companies in the ~~Compensation Peer Group.~~applicable year’s compensation peer group. If an executive officer was located in an area outside of the San Francisco Bay Area, a geographic adjustment was made. Actual compensation for our executive officers may vary from the target

amounts based on the experience level of the individual, market factors, differences in make-up of responsibilities and workload relative to comparative compensation peer group titled positions, and other considerations the Committee may deem appropriate.

Process of Setting and Approving Executive Compensation; Role of Chief Executive Officer

The Committee approves annual compensation levels and equity awards to all of our executive officers. The process is described below:

a.1. Annually, the Committee reviews an independent compensation consultant’s analysis to evaluate for each executive officer (1) a target total compensation amount, (2) the appropriate allocation of base salary, Annual Bonus and long-term equity incentive compensation, (3) risk of any compensation element that could have an adverse impact on the Company, and (4) if there should be any change to the forms of compensation to better align our executive officers’ interests with those of our shareholders.

b.2. For the Chief Executive Officer, the allocation of base salary, Annual Bonus and long term equity incentive compensation and the applicable performance target levels are determined by the Committee, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Directors and separately with all of the independent directors. The Chief Executive Officer has no role in setting his compensation.

c.3. For the other executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer recommends the allocation of base salaries, Annual Bonuses and ~~long term~~long-term equity incentive compensation, and the applicable performance target levels for each of the other executive officers. These recommendations are presented to the Committee for the Committee’s consideration and, if appropriate, approval.

d.4. Shortly after the end of the year, the Chief Executive Officer reviews the performance of each executive officer (other than himself) against ~~their~~his or her established personal objectives for the year and general management responsibilities. The conclusions reached and recommendations based on these reviews are presented by the Chief Executive Officer to the Committee for consideration. The Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying any recommended adjustments or awards. The Committee then approves, as presented or modified, all earned compensation for these executive officers. ~~The~~

5. Shortly after the end of the year, the Committee reviews the Chief Executive Officer’s performance. The Committee then determines, based on the market data and the Chief Executive Officer’s performance, and after consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Directors and separately with all independent directors, the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer.

The Company provides its executive officers and other employees with a base salary to compensate them for services rendered in the fiscal year. Base salary ranges for executive officers are determined for each executive based on his or her position using the following criteria:.

Salary levels are typically considered as part of the Company’s performance review process on an annual basis as well as upon promotion or other change in job responsibility. Merit increases to salaries of each executive officer are based on the Chief Executive Officer and Committee’s assessment of the individual’s performance in his or her annual performance. ~~As discussed above, no base salary increases were received by any named executive officer in 2009 and 2010 due to the Company’s austerity measures described earlier.~~

The table below sets forth the annual base salary of each of our named executive officers in 2011. Based on the performance results of ~~2010,~~2011, the outlook for the Company in ~~2011,~~2012, and Compensia’s analysis, the Committee considered and approved the ~~following~~ increased base salaries for the named executive officers in ~~2011:~~2012 shown in the table below.


Name	2010 Base Salary		2011 Base Salary		2011 Base Salary		2012 Base Salary
Dennis C. Kakures	$	450,000	$	470,000	$	470,000	$	485,000

Joseph F. Hanna					$	310,000	$	325,000
Keith E. Pratt	$	310,000	$	320,000	$	320,000	$	330,000

Joseph F. Hanna	$	300,000	$	310,000

Randle F. Rose	$	220,000	$	240,000	$	240,000	$	255,000

Philip B. Hawkins	$	175,000	$	195,000	$	196,250	$	210,000

In fiscal year ~~2010,~~2011, each executive officer had non-equity performance-based incentive awards as described below:

The ~~Non-Equity Performance-Based Incentive~~Bonus Plan ~~(the “Bonus Plan”)~~ is comprised of two components. The first component compensates the executive for his or her efforts leading to the Company’s success at meeting its annual profitability goals. The second component measures the executive officer’s success at accomplishing his or her personal annual priorities. These two components are used to assure an emphasis on annual profitability and to define each executive officer’s specific role with measurable goals to achieve annual and long-term increases in shareholder value.

Most of our executive officers receive a cash bonus based upon the Company’s success at meeting certain annual profitability goals. The profitability goal of the Company for most of its executive officers (including four of its named executive officers) has two components—80% is based on the Company’s pre-tax income (“PTI”) and 20% is based on the Company’s rental return on rental equipment (“RRRE”). The profitability goal for any Vice President & Division Manager (including one of its named executive officers, Mr. Hawkins, who holds a divisional officer position) is based 60% on their respective divisional profitability, defined as gross profit (“DGP”) less direct selling, general and administrative expenses (“DSG&A”), 20% on the Company’s PTI and 20% on divisional RRRE.

PTI is calculated from results reported on the Company’s income statement. DGP is calculated at a divisional (or business segment) level. The calculation adds gross profit from rental operations, sales and other revenues and then subtracts DSG&A costs that are incurred by the division (or business segment), but excludes corporate overhead costs incurred that are allocated to the division (or business segment). RRRE is calculated by taking gross profit and subtracting DSG&A, then dividing the result by the monthly average original acquisition cost of equipment (including held-for-resale equipment and accessories).

In addition, the Committee added a new metric to the profitability component for 2011, which measures sales, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of rental revenue (“SGAR”). For corporate executive officers, the measure will be based on total Company sales, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total Company rental revenue (“TSGAR”). For divisional executive officers, the measure will be based on divisional sales, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of divisional rental revenue (“DSGAR”).

The Company believes these are the most appropriate metrics to support the long-term financial health of the Company. We use a collaborative process between our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and various other executive officers to determine the annual profitability goal for each of the executive officers of the

Company, which goals are then recommended to the Committee. The Committee then reviews each executive officer’s compensation history and performance before determining final levels for such profitability goals.

The annual profitability goals for each division and the Company are established based upon a “realistic stretch” philosophy. The Company’s management determines the potential annual financial performance for each division and the Company based upon its outlook for the opportunity levels in the markets in which it operates,

strategic and tactical initiatives and other key factors and special circumstances, applying a “realistic stretch” view to what potentially can be accomplished. It is expected that although it would take a significant amount of effort on the part of each individual, 100% of the target annual profitability level can be achieved for the year. It is assumed any amount in excess of the target annual profitability goal would be difficult to achieve unless extraordinary efforts or events occur. Each executive officer has a designated percentage of base salary for the calendar year that can be earned for achieving 100% of his or her respective annual profitability goal. For levels achieved between 80% and 99% of the profitability goal, a rapidly reducing scale is utilized to determine bonus percentage amounts of base salary as shown in the table below:


% of “Profitability Goal” Achieved		% of Total “Profitability Goal” Bonus Monies Available
% of Profitability Goal Achieved				% of Total Profitability Goal Bonus Monies Available
100%	100%		100%	100%
98%	98%		90%	90%
96%	96%		80%	80%
94%	94%		70%	70%
92%	92%		60%	60%
90%	90%		55%	55%
89%	89%		50%	50%
88%	88%		45%	45%
87%	87%		40%	40%
86%	86%		35%	35%
85%	85%		30%	30%
84%	84%		25%	25%
83%	83%		20%	20%
82%	82%		15%	15%
81%	81%		10%	10%
80%	80%		5%	5%

No amount is paid for levels below 80% of the profitability goal. For each 1% increase achieved above 100% of the profitability goals for PTI and DGP, an additional 2% of base salary is awarded. For each 1% achieved above 100% of the profitability goal for RRRE, up to a maximum increase of 15% above the 100% target level, an additional 2% of base salary is awarded, multiplied by the profitability goal percentage bonus amount. The maximum overage percentage of base salary that can be earned by an executive officer cumulatively for all profitability goals is the individual executive officer’s maximum profitability percentage at 100% of achievement of the goal, as listed below for the named executive officers under ~~“Bonus~~“Bonus Plan Percentages,” so that the maximum he or she can earn is two times the target bonus percentage for profitability.

The second component for the Bonus Plan measures each executive officer’s success at accomplishing his or her personal annual priorities. Final determination of the personal annual priorities for each executive officer ~~will rest~~rests with the Chief Executive Officer (other than the personal annual priorities of the Chief Executive Officer, which are determined by the Committee, after consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Directors and separately with all independent directors). These personal annual priorities are measured periodically throughout the year and paid annually, using a collaborative process between the Chief Executive Officer or a Senior Vice

President and each executive officer. The personal annual priorities for each executive officer generally are comprised of a maximum of four items deemed to be the most critical priorities that require action to be taken for the current evaluation period. Each priority is weighted according to (1) the critical nature of the priority relative to other priorities, and (2) the amount of time and effort involved in accomplishing the priority relative to other priorities.

Listed below under ~~“Bonus~~“Bonus Plan ~~Percentages”~~Percentages” is a schedule identifying each named executive officer and the percentage amounts of base salary for the calendar year ~~2010~~2011 that could have been earned under this component for achieving a 100% rating for all personal priorities. In the event of truly outstanding achievement under an individual personal annual priority, an executive officer may receive up to a maximum score of 125%. Although infrequent, it is possible for an executive officer to achieve 125% in each of his or her personal annual priorities. Each personal annual priority goal represents a challenge and complete success is not always solely in the control of the executive officer. There are factors that may affect the outcome, including changes in market conditions and unanticipated variables. Each personal annual priority is measured and the overall weighted average of achievement for all personal annual priorities is multiplied by the total percentage of base salary allotted to personal annual priorities available to each executive officer. Annually, the Committee uses its discretion to allocate specific percentages of profitability and personal annual priorities for each executive officer.

Percentages of calendar year ~~2010~~2011 base salary amounts for ~~both~~ the profitability goal and the personal annual priorities components ~~per~~for each named executive officer ~~position~~ are listed in the table below (which includes percentages applicable if the target is met for each goal, as well as the maximum percentages applicable if the target is exceeded for each goal). ~~Note that for fiscal year 2010, as part of management’s expense reduction efforts, a 25% reduction of 2010 bonus target percentages was implemented, which is reflected in the following percentages:~~


Name	Profitability (at 100% of Achievement)			Maximum Profitability (at maximum overage percentage)			Personal Annual Priorities (at 100% of Achievement)			Maximum Personal Annual Priorities (at 125% of Achievement)			Total Annual Bonus (at 100% of Achievement)			Maximum Annual Bonus			Profitability (at 100% of Achievement)			Maximum Profitability (at maximum overage percentage)			Personal Annual Priorities (at 100% of Achievement)			Maximum Personal Annual Priorities (at 125% of Achievement)			Total Annual Bonus (at 100% of Achievement)			Maximum Annual Bonus
Dennis C. Kakures		30.00	%		60.00	%		22.50	%		28.13	%		52.50	%		88.13	%		50.00	%		100.00	%		25.00	%		31.25	%		75.00	%		131.25	%

Joseph F. Hanna																				45.00	%		90.00	%		20.00	%		25.00	%		65.00	%		115.00	%

Keith E. Pratt		26.25	%		52.50	%		18.75	%		23.44	%		45.00	%		75.94	%		40.00	%		80.00	%		20.00	%		25.00	%		60.00	%		105.00	%

Joseph F. Hanna		26.25	%		52.50	%		22.50	%		28.13	%		48.75	%		80.63	%

Randle F. Rose		7.50	%		15.00	%		30.00	%		37.50	%		37.50	%		52.50	%		20.00	%		40.00	%		30.00	%		37.50	%		50.00	%		77.50	%

Philip B. Hawkins		18.75	%		37.50	%		18.75	%		23.44	%		37.50	%		60.94	%		40.00	%		80.00	%		20.00	%		25.00	%		60.00	%		105.00	%

The Company’s ~~2010~~2011 annual PTI profitability goal was ~~$53,035,000.~~$63,739,000. The actual ~~2010~~2011 annual PTI achieved was ~~$59,050,000,~~$81,058,000, or ~~111%~~127% of the goal.

Mr. Kakures achieved ~~97%~~93% of his ~~2010 Personal Annual Priorities~~2011 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of managing strategic growth initiatives, SG&A expense control, continued expansion of Adler ~~integration and expansion~~Tank Rentals’ activities, and ~~Adler succession planning. Mr. Pratt achieved 100% of his 2010 Personal Annual Priorities goals, consisting of refining dividend philosophy, undertaking~~other strategic ~~growth initiatives, capital structure enhancements,~~ and ~~information system upgrades.~~tactical initiatives. Mr. Hanna achieved ~~88%~~94% of his ~~2010 Personal Annual Priorities~~2011 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of the success of new initiatives, go-to-market strategies, ~~divisional strategic reviews,~~ and ~~expansion planning.~~other leadership and sales development activities. Mr. ~~Rose~~Pratt achieved 95% of his ~~2010 Personal Annual Priorities~~2011 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of strengthening long-term capital structure, implementing a new enterprise financial system, continued investor relations activities, SG&A expense control, and other strategic initiatives. Mr. Rose achieved 82% of his 2011 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of success of ~~the~~ real estate and facility development, enterprise risk management, ~~and~~ information technology ~~initiatives.~~and safety initiatives, and corporate succession planning. Mr. Hawkins achieved ~~96%~~91% of his ~~2010 Personal Annual Priorities~~2011 personal annual priorities goals, consisting of sales and asset management initiatives, environmental sector growth, and strategic ~~growth initiatives, and information technology~~ initiatives.

The ~~2010 annual bonus plan~~Annual Bonus amounts under the Bonus Plan paid ~~for~~to each of the named executive officers are listed in column (g) in the ~~“Summary~~“Summary Compensation Table” on page 3231 of this Proxy Statement.

~~Based on the performance results~~The percentages of ~~2010, the outlook~~calendar year 2012 base salary amounts for the ~~Company in 2011,~~profitability goal and ~~Compensia’s analysis,~~ the ~~Committee considered and removed the 2009-2010 austerity measures~~personal annual priorities components for ~~the~~each named executive officer ~~bonus target~~are the same as the percentages ~~for 2011. In keeping with~~listed above under “Bonus Plan Percentages”.

Under the ~~policy~~terms of ~~shifting more incentive toward financial performance,~~ the ~~Committee modified the named executive officers’ bonus percentages for 2011 as shown~~Bonus Plan, in ~~the table below.~~

In addition, the Committee added a new profitability metric to the Annual Bonus component for 2011, which measures sales, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of rental revenue (“SGAR”). For corporate executive officers, the measure will be based on total Company sales, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total Company rental revenue (“TSGAR”). For divisional executive officers, the measure will be based on divisional sales, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of divisional rental revenue (“DSGAR”).

In the event of a named executive officer’s termination with the Company, voluntarily or involuntarily, with or without cause, which occurs prior to the end of the fiscal year, his or her cash bonus shall be prorated accordingly and distributed to such named executive officer upon termination.

~~Our historical philosophy in~~Historically, we had a practice of granting stock options served us well over time, facilitating our ability to both attract and retain key senior leadership. Our belief was that the use of stock options was the best “performance-based” equity vehicle because of our focus on long-term sustained growth in earnings per share, accomplished through net income growth, efficient use of capital and optimizing strategic growth opportunities. Our intent was that our executive officers be rewarded when our shareholders realize long-term growth in the price appreciation of our stock. Unless our financial performance over a long-term period drives an increase in our stock price, the options granted provide little or no value to our executive officers. Our practice had been to grant annual stock options to executive officers with a five-year vesting period (20% per year)., based on our philosophy of rewarding our executive officers when our shareholders realized long-term growth in the appreciation of our stock.

In the second half of 2009, the Committee directed management and Compensia to evaluate a variety of equity grant alternatives allowed under the 2007 ~~Plan.~~Plan, including stock options, SARs and RSUs. Criteria considered included the direct correlation between the financial performance of the Company, the employee’s profit and loss domain and the grant level earned, the dilutive impact of stock option grants to earnings per share (“EPS”), and the employee’s ability to increase his or her personal holdings of the Company’s shares. Based on this evaluation, the Committee concluded it would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to modify its equity granting approach beginning in 2010 to 50% personal merit/service-based equity awards and 50% EPS performance-based awards. The goal was to increase the employee’s focus on long-term EPS financial performance, decrease the share dilution impact of stock option grants, and increase the likelihood of employees holding more shares over time.

For designated employees, including executive officers, the new approach approved by the Committee is to grant 50% of the established Black-Scholes value as ~~stock appreciation rights (SARs)~~SARs vesting over five (5) years. In effect, the SARs are merit/service-based equity remuneration. The other 50% of the Black-Scholes value are

granted as ~~restricted stock units (RSUs)~~RSUs and earned based upon achievement of a three-year cumulative EPS goal with 60% vesting upon meeting the EPS target at the end of year three and subsequent vesting of 20% per year over next two years.

In 2010, the Committee approved a change for divisional officer positions, including Mr. Hawkins, for the 50% RSU equity grant to be earned based upon a three-year cumulative EBIT performance of their respective division rather than a three-year cumulative Company EPS target. By having each divisional officer’s performance tied directly to his or her respective division’s performance, it allows for that officer to be measured without the influence, positive or negative, of any other division’s performance.

In addition, the Committee approved a change to the settlement requirements of the RSUs granted in 2011 and later, such that for all RSU grants settled in net shares (after the Company withholds shares in connection with the individual employee’s tax liability), a minimum of 10% of those net shares must be retained by the executive officer until they have met the stock ownership levels described in “Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines” below.

Consistent with the Company’s Equity Granting Policy, as described under that heading below, in February ~~2010,~~2011, designated employees, including executive officers, received equity grants, the amounts of which that were granted to our named executive officers are listed in the ~~2010 Grants~~“2011 Grant of Plan-Based Awards” table on page 3332 of this Proxy Statement.

When making equity grants, we first establish a dollar value of the total equity compensation to be awarded ~~for~~to each executive officer ~~position~~ based on Compensia’s analysis. On the date of the grant, we divide that total equity fair value dollar amount by the per share fair value, calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and generally round to the nearest 100 shares to determine the number of shares underlying options to be awarded. Although we use what we consider to be a reasoned approach in determining the number of underlying shares to award our executive officers with a formula that is based on a widely accepted option-pricing model, the ultimate value of the equity issued only becomes clear when underlying shares vest and are sold. The SARs may not realize any value, or they may be worth much more than the fair value initially estimated. As a result, we do not consider realizable gains from prior stock option or other types of equity grants or existing levels of share ownership when setting new grant amounts.

Based on the performance results of 2010, the outlook for the Company in 2011, and Compensia’s analysis, the Committee considered and approved a modification to the 2011 total equity compensation for the named executive officers. For divisional officer positions, including Mr. Hawkins, the 50% RSU equity grant may be earned based upon a three-year cumulative EBIT performance of their respective division rather than a three-year cumulative Company EPS target. By having each divisional officer’s performance tied directly to his or her respective division’s performance, it allows for the leader to be measured without the influence, positive or negative, of any other division’s performance.

In addition, the Committee approved a change to the settlement requirements of the RSUs granted in 2011, such that for all RSU grants settled in net shares (after the Company withholds shares in connection with the individual employee’s tax liability), a minimum of 10% of those net shares must be retained by the executive officer until they have met the Executive Officer Equity Ownership Guidelines as described below.

The Board of Directors believes that, in order to better align the interests of management and shareholders, executive officers should have a significant financial (equity) stake in the Company. Each executive officer has a target level of Company Common Stock value to achieve within seven (7) years of the later of his or her date of hire or March 1, 2007. The target level of Common Stock value to be achieved is a multiple of each executive officer’s base salary. The multiples of executive officer base salary isare four (4) times for the Chief Executive Officer and two (2) times for all other executive officer positions. In evaluating whether the Common Stock value ownership guideline has been met, all ~~common~~ shares of Common Stock owned, Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares and 50% of the value (market price less strike price) of all vested unexercised stock options are considered. The Board of Directors evaluates whether exceptions should be made for any executive officer on whom this requirement would impose a financial hardship.

In 2007, the Board of Directors adopted an equity granting methodology for all designated directors, executive officers and key employees whereby there will be one annual equity grant date. This date is the date when the blackout window opens after the Company’s year-end earnings are released. All designated directors, executive officers and employees are eligible to receive an equity grant on the annual equity grant date with an exercise

price (for stock options and ~~stock appreciation rights)~~SARs), or grant price (for RSUs), equal to the NASDAQ Stock Market close price on that day. The Board of Directors convenes a meeting on this date after the NASDAQ Stock Market closes to determine the number of shares to be granted. The Board of Directors may grant to the Chief Executive Officer an additional allotment of options or shares to be granted at his discretion to new hires and promotion candidates over the course of the following year, with the grant date and exercise or grant price based on the last trading day of each month of the employment event. This allotment is not available to executive officers, as all grants to executive officers must be made by the Committee.

In 2011, the Board of Directors adopted a Compensation Recoupment Policy that applies to executive officers if the Company is required to restate its financial statements. The Board believes it is desirable and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to maintain and enhance a culture that is focused on integrity and accountability and believes that this policy discourages conduct detrimental to the Company’s sustained growth. This Compensation Recoupment Policy requires any current or former executive officer, in the event of a financial restatement, to reimburse the Company with respect to any incentive compensation received during the past three years that is in excess of that which would have been received if such compensation had been based upon the financial statements as so restated.

Pursuant to the Company’s Insider Trading Policy, which was most recently amended and restated on December 9, 2010, executives of the Company are prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with respect

to the Company’s Common Stock, such as puts, calls and other exchange-traded derivatives, without prior consent of the Company’s compliance officer. These transactions reduce or cancel the risk of an investment in the Common Stock, particularly in the short-term. Therefore, they may create the appearance that the executives are trading on inside information. Additionally, certain forms of hedging or monetization transactions allow a shareholder to lock in much of the value of his or her stock holdings, often in exchange for all or part of the potential for upside appreciation in the stock. These transactions allow the holder to continue to own the covered securities, but without full risks and rewards of ownership. Therefore, executives are also prohibited from hedging transactions without prior consent of the Company’s compliance officer. No executive has been approved for any transaction described in this paragraph.

Executive officers are entitled to and eligible only for the same fringe benefits for which all of our employees are eligible. We do not have programs in place to provide personal perquisites for any employee. Our healthcare and other insurance programs, including the ~~program’s~~programs’ participation costs, are the same for all eligible employees, except that any executive officer employed with the Company for at least 20 years may remain on the Company’s health insurance policy after retiring from the Company, provided that such executive officer pays 100% of the premiums. Our annual discretionary contributions to the Company’s ESOP, expressed as a percentage of eligible wages, are also the same for all eligible employees, including each named executive officer, subject to all applicable Internal Revenue Service contribution limits and formulas for plans of these types.

We do not have special severance or change in control arrangements with our executive team; however, our equity compensation plans provide for full acceleration of equity awards upon a qualifying termination after a change in control for all employees of the Company. The Committee believes that providing this vesting acceleration assists us in attracting and retaining key employees, including our executives, and promotes stability

and continuity of our key ~~employees. We~~employees, which we believe ~~that the stability and continuity provided by this provision~~ is in the best interests of our ~~stockholders.~~shareholders. For details, see ~~“Potential~~“Potential Payments upon Termination or ~~Change-in-Control”~~Change-in-Control” on page 3836 of this Proxy Statement.

Section 162(m) of the Code limits the corporate deduction for compensation paid to executive officers to $1 million unless such compensation qualifies as “performance-based compensation.” Among other things, Section 162(m) requires approval of the performance-based compensation by our shareholders. The Compensation Committee intends to maximize our ability to deduct executive compensation for tax purposes to the extent structuring our executive compensation for tax purposes is in alignment with our compensation philosophy. With respect to the compensation paid to our named executive officers in ~~2010,~~2011, the ~~cash~~ compensation was below the $1 million limit for all of our named executive officers, except ~~for~~ Mr. Kakures with compensation of ~~$426,570~~$414,154 above the ~~162(m) limit. The Company’s equity grants allowed under the 2007 plan have been structured to qualify as performance-based compensation under~~ Section 162(m) ~~of the Code.~~limit.

We accrue our named executive officers’ salaries and incentive awards as an expense when earned. For our stock ~~options,~~based compensation, the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation ~~(formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, and referred to here as “ASC Topic~~(“ASC 718”), requires us to recognize compensation expense within our income statement for all share-based payment arrangements, which includes employee ~~equity~~stock option plans. The expense is based on the grant-date fair value of the ~~equity~~options granted, and is recognized ratably over the requisite service period. Our stock options ~~RSU’s and SAR’s~~ are accounted for as equity awards. The Committee considers the expense of equity awards as part of its overall evaluation of our equity compensation program.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company’s previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, that might incorporate future filings, including this Proxy Statement, with the SEC, in whole or in part, the following report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filings, nor shall the following report be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, unless specifically stated to be incorporated by reference therein.

The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

The following table provides summary information concerning the compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and each of our three most highly compensated executive officers during our last completed fiscal year whose total salary, bonus and other compensation exceeded ~~$100,000 during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.~~$100,000. The executive officers listed below are referred to in this Proxy Statement as the “named executive officers.”


	Option Awards				Stock Awards				Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Dennis C. Kakures		48,300	$	816,299		—		—		115,300	$	1,353,389		—		—
Joseph F. Hanna										18,000	$	292,770		—		—
Keith E. Pratt		24,500	$	233,088		—		—		14,000	$	173,478		—		—
Joseph F. Hanna		—		—		—		—
Randle F. Rose		61,850	$	421,456		—		—		—		—		—		—
Philip B. Hawkins		41,950	$	251,997		—		—		14,600	$	137,515		—		—

~~Our shareholders have approved the 2007 Plan and the 1998 Stock Option Plan.~~ The following table provides information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, ~~2010:~~2011:


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)		(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		3,344,450	$	22.80		956,250		3,086,019	$	23.52		547,834
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Total		3,344,450	$	22.80		956,250		3,086,019	$	23.52		547,834

The ESOP is intended to qualify as an employee stock ownership plan as defined in Section 4975(e)(7) of the Code, and as a stock bonus plan under Section 401(a) of the Code. The Company created a trust under the ESOP to hold plan assets, with Union Bank of California, N.A. acting as trustee. The Company may amend or terminate the ESOP at any time. In September 2003, the Company amended the ESOP to name North Star Trust Company as ~~Trustee~~trustee in place of Delight Saxton and Thomas J. Sauer. The ESOP was amended and restated on January 1, 2008 to amend certain definitions and to provide the Company with the option to establish a policy under which employees may elect voluntarily to not participate in the ESOP, among other amendments. All assets acquired by the trust are administered by a plan committee (the “Plan Committee”) composed of long-term Company employees ~~(the “Plan Committee”)~~ Deborah Barbe, Kay Dashner, Brian Jensen, Tony Moton and Garni Thomas for the exclusive benefit of employees who are participants in the ESOP and their designated beneficiaries.

Employees who are 21 years or older are entitled to participate in the ESOP when they have completed one year of service to the Company by June 30 of any year. As of December 31, ~~2010, 515~~2011, 514 employees of the Company were participants in the ESOP. Allocations to each eligible participant’s trust account are made each year from Company contributions, trust income or loss and re-allocations of forfeited ESOP benefits if the

participant remains employed throughout the year and has worked a minimum number of hours or his or her employment has terminated due to death, disability or Normal Retirement (as that term is defined in the ESOP) during that year. Allocations are made based upon each participant’s compensation and time employed by the Company. As provided by the ESOP, a participant’s interest in the ESOP becomes 20% vested after two years of

service and will continue to vest at 20% per year thereafter until it is fully vested after the sixth year, or upon death, disability or Normal Retirement. The vesting schedule will be accelerated and the Company’s contributions and ESOP allocations will be modified if the ESOP becomes a “top heavy plan” under federal tax laws.

ESOP benefits fully vest upon a participant’s death, disability or Normal Retirement. In the case of a participant’s termination with the Company, voluntary or involuntary, for cause or not for cause, such participant shall receive any and all ESOP benefits which have vested as of the date of termination.

In general, Company contributions are immediately tax deductible by the Company, but participants do not recognize income for tax purposes until distributions are made to them. The Company’s Board of Directors determines the amount of Company contributions to the ESOP to be made each year in cash, Company Common Stock, by forgiveness of indebtedness owed by the ~~Trust~~trust to the Company or any Affiliated Company (as that term is defined in the ESOP) or by the Company’s or an Affiliated Company’s payment of indebtedness owed by the ~~Trust~~trust to any third party, with consideration for federal tax laws. The Company did not make a cash contribution to the ESOP for the ~~2010~~2011 plan year, and the Company made cash contributions totaling ~~$3,400,000 for~~$2,100,000 during the four years prior to ~~that.~~the 2011 plan year. Employees may not make contributions to the ESOP. Contributions in cash are used to purchase Company Common Stock. However, other investments may be made and loans may be incurred by the ESOP for the purchase of Company Common Stock.

The Plan Committee has determined that cash dividends paid by the Company on shares of the Company’s Common Stock held by the ESOP shall be paid out to the participants. The Plan Committee has the right to revoke this decision at any time.

~~The purpose~~A general description of ~~the~~our 2007 Plan is ~~to retain key employees, consultants~~set forth below in the section entitled “General Description of our 2007 Plan” and ~~directors~~is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the ~~Company having experience~~proposed amended and ability, to attract new employees, consultants and directors whose services are considered valuable, and to encourage a sense of proprietorship and to stimulate the active interest of such persons in the development and financial success of the Company and its subsidiaries. All of our employees, consultants and directors are eligible to participate in the 2007 Plan. The Board of Directors believes that grants of options and other forms of equity participation is an increasingly important means to retain and compensate employees, consultants and directors. The 2007 Plan provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, and stock appreciation rights (collectively referred to as “awards”). Stock options granted under the 2007 Plan may be either incentive stock options under the provisions of Section 422 of the Code, or nonqualified stock options. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees. Awards other than incentive stock options may be granted to employees, directors and consultants of the Company and its related entities. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of shares of the Company’s Common Stock which are subject to options designated as incentive stock options and which become exercisable for the first time by a participant during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, such excess options shall be treated as nonqualified stock options. Under the 2007 Plan, awards may be granted to such employees, directors or consultants who are residing in non-U.S. jurisdictions as the administrator may determine from time to time. Each award granted under the 2007 Plan shall be designated in an award agreement.

As of March 31, 2011, options for an aggregate of 1,966,000 shares have been granted to 72 key employees at exercise prices ranging between $15.62 and $34.28 per share; and of such options granted, 221,221 have been exercised for the purchase of shares, options for 73,400 shares have been terminated, and options for 1,671,379 shares remain outstanding. In addition to these options to key employees, options for an aggregate of 154,000 shares have been granted to non-employee directors of the Company at an exercise price of $20.71 per share; no options have been exercised, options to purchase 22,000 shares have been terminated, and options for 132,000 shares remain outstanding.

As of March 31, 2011, RSUs for an aggregate of 219,000 shares have been granted to 34 key employees; and of such RSUs granted, 30,200 RSUs have vested, and 18,800 RSUs have been terminated. In addition to these RSUs to key employees, RSUs for an aggregate of 53,000 shares have been granted to non-employee directors of the Company; and of such RSUs granted, 20,000 RSUs have vested and no RSUs have been terminated.

~~As of March 31, 2011, a total of 578,650 shares remain available in the 2007 Plan for future grants.~~

~~If there is a “corporate transaction” of the Company (as defined in the~~restated 2007 Plan, a ~~“Corporate Transaction”), all outstanding awards will terminate if not assumed~~copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement asAppendix A and is incorporated herein by the successor entity. In addition and except as otherwise provided in an individual award agreement, assumed or replaced awards will automatically become fully vested if a participant is terminated by the acquirer without cause within 12 months after a Corporate Transaction. In the event of a Corporate Transaction where the acquirer does not assume or replace awards, all of these awards become fully vested immediately prior to the consummation of the Corporate Transaction. In the event of a “change in control” of the Company (as defined in the 2007 Plan, a “Change in Control”) and except as otherwise provided in an individual award agreement, outstanding awards will automatically become fully vested if a participant is terminated by the acquirer without cause within 12 months after such Change in Control.

In the event an option holder ceases to be employed by the Company (either voluntarily or involuntarily without cause), outside the context of a Change in Control, the exercise rights under his or her option will not accelerate and will not become fully vested and the option holder may exercise his or her option before the earlier of (1) 90 days after the date he or she ceases to be an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries and (2) the normal expiration date of the option. In the event an option holder is terminated by the Company with cause, the exercise rights under his or her option terminate on the date he or she ceases to be an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries, except as otherwise determined by the Company. In the event an option holder ceases to be employed by the Company by reason of disability or death, the exercise rights under his or her option do not accelerate and do not become fully vested and the option holder may exercise his or her option before the earlier of (1) 12 months after the date he or she ceases to be an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries (or in the case of death which occurs three months after termination of employment, 12 months after the date of death) and (2) the normal expiration date of the option.reference.

The 2007 Plan replaced the Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan (as amended, the “1998 Plan”) and no further options will be granted under the 1998 Plan. As of March 31, ~~2011,~~2012, options for an aggregate of 3,622,500 shares of Common Stock have been granted to 144 key employees at exercise prices ranging between $7.81 and $31.67 per share; and of such options granted, options have been exercised for the purchase of ~~1,755,650~~1,915,167 shares, options for ~~587,750~~619,250 shares have been terminated, and options for ~~1,279,100~~1,088,083 shares remain outstanding. In addition to these options to key employees, options for an aggregate of 528,000 shares have been granted to non-employee directors of the Company at exercise prices ranging between $7.97 and $31.14 per share; and of such options granted, ~~171,000~~189,000 shares have been exercised, options for 20,000 shares have been terminated, and options for ~~337,000~~319,000 shares remain outstanding.

If there is an “acquisition” of the Company (as defined in the 1998 Plan, an “Acquisition”), the acquirer may assume the options or replace the options for new options under the acquirer’s plan. If the options are not assumed or replaced, options will automatically become fully vested and exercisable as of the date of the Acquisition. In the event of ~~an Acquisition where the acquirer does not assume or replace the options, the options become fully vested immediately prior to the consummation of the Acquisition. In the event of~~ a “change in control” (as defined in the 1998 Plan) of the Company, outstanding options will automatically become fully vested if the option holder’s employment is terminated other than by the option holder with or without cause within two years after such change in control.

Except as described below, in the event an option holder ceases to be employed by the Company for any reason (either voluntarily or involuntarily, for cause or not for cause), outside the context of a change in control, the exercise rights under his or her option will not accelerate and will not become fully vested and the option holder may exercise his or her option before the earlier of (1) three months after the date he or she ceases to be an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries and (2) the normal expiration date of the option. In the event an option holder ceases to be employed by the Company by reason of disability or death, the exercise rights under his or her option do not accelerate and do not become fully vested and the option holder may exercise his or her option before the earlier of (1) 12 months after the date he or she ceases to be an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries (or in the case of death which occurs within three months after termination of employment, 12 months after the date of death) and (2) the normal expiration date of the option.

In 1995, the Company established a contributory retirement plan, the McGrath RentCorp 401(k) Plan, as amended (the “401(k) Plan”), covering eligible employees of the Company with at least three months of service. The 401(k) Plan provides that each participant may annually contribute an elected percentage of his or her salary, not to exceed the statutory limit. The Company, at its discretion, may make matching contributions. ~~The~~Due to austerity measures, the Company made ~~an employer~~no contributions in 2010 and nonelective ~~contribution~~contributions of ~~$882,000~~$1,019,903 in ~~2009 and due to continued austerity measures, made no contribution in 2010.~~2011.

Under the terms of our Bonus Plan, 1998 Plan, 2007 Plan, and ESOP, payments may be made to each of our named executive officers upon his or her termination of employment or a change in control (as defined in each plan) of the Company. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” for a description of, and an explanation of the specific circumstances that would trigger payments under, each plan.

The following table sets forth the estimated payments that would be made to each of our named executive officers upon voluntary termination, involuntary termination—not for cause,—for cause, ~~or—~~or as a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control (as defined in each plan), —and death or permanent disability. The payments would be made pursuant to the plans identified in the ~~preceding~~above paragraph. The information set forth in the table below assumes the termination event occurred on December 31, ~~2010.~~

2011. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of ~~such~~an executive’s separation from the Company and may differ materially from the amounts set forth in the table below. The amounts set forth in the table below do not reflect the withholding of applicable state and federal taxes.


Name	Voluntary Termination		Involuntary Termination						Death or Permanent Disability		Voluntary Termination		Involuntary Termination						Death or Permanent Disability
			Not For Cause		For Cause		Change in Control						Not For Cause		For Cause		Change in Control
Dennis C. Kakures
Non-Equity Incentive Plan(1)	$	321,048	$	321,048	$	321,048	$	321,048	$	321,048	$	554,907	$	554,907	$	554,907	$	554,907	$	554,907
Unvested and Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		1,966,877		1,966,877		1,966,877		3,877,500		1,966,877		2,018,272		2,018,272		2,018,272		4,212,637		2,018,272
Employee Stock Ownership Plan		1,683,417		1,683,417		1,683,417		1,683,417		1,683,417		2,173,525		2,173,525		2,173,525		2,173,525		2,173,525
Accumulated Vacation Pay(3)		57,914		57,914		57,914		57,914		57,914		60,040		60,040		60,040		60,040		60,040

Total	$	4,029,256	$	4,029,256	$	4,029,256	$	5,939,879	$	4,029,256	$	4,806,744	$	4,806,744	$	4,806,744	$	7,001,109	$	4,806,744
Keith E. Pratt
Joseph F. Hanna
Non-Equity Incentive Plan(1)	$	200,044	$	200,044	$	200,044	$	200,044	$	200,044	$	336,038	$	336,038	$	336,038	$	336,038	$	336,038
Unvested and Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		272,745		272,745		272,745		1,205,440		272,745		2,475,514		2,475,514		2,475,514		3,589,077		2,475,514
Employee Stock Ownership Plan		13,394		13,394		13,394		13,394		13,394		55,806		55,806		55,806		55,806		55,806
Accumulated Vacation Pay(3)		9,084		9,084		9,084		9,084		9,084		31,139		31,139		31,139		31,139		31,139

Total	$	495,267	$	495,267	$	495,267	$	1,427,962	$	495,267	$	2,898,497	$	2,898,497	$	2,898,497	$	4,012,060	$	2,898,497
Joseph F. Hanna
Keith E. Pratt
Non-Equity Incentive Plan(1)	$	196,673	$	196,673	$	196,673	$	196,673	$	196,673	$	316,420	$	316,420	$	316,420	$	316,420	$	316,420
Unvested and Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		1,775,588		1,775,588		1,775,588		2,821,840		1,775,588		592,616		592,616		592,616		1,665,352		592,616
Employee Stock Ownership Plan		43,110		43,110		43,110		43,110		43,110		17,452		17,452		17,452		17,452		17,452
Accumulated Vacation Pay(3)		19,060		19,060		19,060		19,060		19,060		19,316		19,316		19,316		19,316		19,316

Total	$	2,034,431	$	2,034,431	$	2,034,431	$	3,080,683	$	2,034,431	$	945,804	$	945,804	$	945,804	$	2,018,540	$	945,804
Randle F. Rose
Non-Equity Incentive Plan(1)	$	95,568	$	95,568	$	95,568	$	95,568	$	95,568	$	154,543	$	154,543	$	154,543	$	154,543	$	154,543
Unvested and Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		0		0		0		379,242		0		148,684		148,684		148,684		600,270		148,684
Employee Stock Ownership Plan		116,898		116,898		116,898		116,898		116,898		151,067		151,067		151,067		151,067		151,067
Accumulated Vacation Pay(3)		7,032		7,032		7,032		7,032		7,032		19,240		19,240		19,240		19,240		19,240

Total	$	219,498	$	219,498	$	219,498	$	598,740	$	219,498	$	473,534	$	473,534	$	473,534	$	925,120	$	473,534
Philip B. Hawkins
Non-Equity Incentive Plan(1)	$	96,215	$	96,215	$	96,215	$	96,215	$	96,215	$	191,404	$	191,404	$	191,404	$	191,404	$	191,404
Unvested and Accelerated Awards Under Equity Incentive Plans(2)		0		0		0		441,442		0		17,745		17,745		17,745		526,124		17,745
Employee Stock Ownership Plan		32,355		32,355		32,355		32,355		32,355		41,920		41,920		41,920		41,920		41,920
Accumulated Vacation Pay(3)		1,150		1,150		1,150		1,150		1,150		4,797		4,797		4,797		4,797		4,797

Total	$	129,720	$	129,720	$	129,720	$	571,162	$	129,720	$	255,866	$	255,866	$	255,866		764,245	$	255,866

Executive Severance Policy. We do not have employment agreements or an executive severance policy.

Pension Benefits. All employees who participate in our ESOP are entitled to their vested amounts upon termination of their employment.

Health and Welfare ~~Benefit~~Benefits and Executive Benefits and Perquisites Continuation. An executive officer is not entitled to any continuation of his or her health and welfare benefits, executive benefits or perquisites (other than pursuant to COBRA) following the termination of his or her employment, except that any executive officer employed with the Company for at least 20 years may remain on the Company’s health insurance policy after he or she retires from the Company, provided he or she pays 100% of the premiums.

Long-Term Incentives.��Except in the circumstances discussed below, an executive officer forfeits his or her stock options to the extent they are unvested and is not entitled to any continuation of vesting or acceleration of vesting with respect to his or her options. Such executive is entitled to exercise any vested options for a period of 90 days after termination and is entitled to continue to hold his or her shares of unrestricted stock after termination in the same manner as any other employee of the Company. In the event of a qualifying termination following a change in control, an executive officer is entitled to the acceleration of vesting with respect to all of his or her stock options, in the same manner as any other employee of the Company.

There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of the Company, except that David M. Whitney and Kristina VanTrease are husband and wife.

The Compensation Committee of the Company during ~~2010~~2011 consisted of Messrs. Dawson, Hood, Smith and Stradford. No member of the Compensation Committee is a present or former executive officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. No executive officer of the Company has served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity which has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below for discussions about related transactions regarding the Compensation Committee members.

The Company has entered into ~~Indemnification Agreements~~indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements require the Company to indemnify our executive officers or directors against expenses and, in certain cases, judgments, settlements or other payments incurred by an executive officer or director in suits brought by the Company, derivative actions brought by our shareholders and suits brought by other third parties. Indemnification has been granted under these agreements to the fullest extent permitted under California law in situations where an executive officer or director is made, or threatened to be made, a party to the legal proceeding because of his or her service to the Company.

In connection with the completion of the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of the liquid and solid tanks and boxes rental business of Adler Tank Rentals, LLC on December 11, 2008, we hired Steven Adler, who, prior to the closing, owned 75% of Adler Tank Rentals, LLC (“Former Adler Tanks”). Mr. Adler currently holds the position of President of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Adler Tank Rentals, LLC (“Adler Tanks”), which owns and operates the Adler Tanks business. Mr. Adler has a number of relationships with entities that conduct business with Adler Tanks which are described below.

In addition, a five acre parcel in Beaumont, Texas owned by Jaws Realty, LLC was purchased by Adler Tanks in February 2011 for $360,000. This parcel is currently under development as a sales and inventory center facility to support the expansion of Adler Tanks’ regional operations in Beaumont, Texas.

Prior to the closing of the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Former Adler Tanks, and the real estate transactions consummated in 2011, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors reviewed and granted waivers under the Company’s ~~code~~Code of ~~business conduct~~Business Conduct and ~~ethics~~Ethics with respect to the conflicts of interest and related party transactions and relationships described above under“Adler Tank Rentals”.

Pursuant to the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing with management and the Company’s independent auditors any transactions or courses of dealing with related parties. The Audit Committee considers the following factors in determining whether to approve or disapprove (with referral to the Board of Directors) any such related party transaction or course of action: (i) the financial accounting accorded the transaction or course of action; (ii) whether the terms or other aspects differ from those that would likely be negotiated with independent parties; and (iii) whether the proposed disclosure of the transaction or course of dealing, if any, is in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and SEC regulations.

The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company with respect to beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of April ~~11, 2011,~~16, 2012, by (i) each shareholder known to the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock; (ii) each of our directors; (iii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table above; and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group:

Our Board of Directors believes that full and open communication between shareholders and members of our Board of Directors is in the best interests of our shareholders. Shareholders may contact any director or committee of the Board of Directors by writing to the Compliance Officer, c/o McGrath RentCorp, 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551. The compliance officer will review all such communications for relevance to activities of the Board of Directors and will promptly forward all relevant written communications to the Board of Directors. Comments or complaints relating to our accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing matters, corporate fraud or violations of federal or state laws may be referred directly to our Audit Committee by writing to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, c/o Compliance Officer, McGrath RentCorp, 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, California 94551. Further details can be found in ~~our~~ “Reporting Questionable Account and Auditing Practices and Policy Prohibiting Retaliation Against Reporting Employees” and “Corporate Governance Guidelines” found on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investor Relations section.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider shareholder recommendations of director nominees. To recommend director nominee(s), a shareholder must submit the following relevant information in writing to the attention of the compliance officer at our principal executive offices: (1) the name, age, business and residence address of the prospective candidate; (2) a brief biographical description of the prospective candidate, including employment history for the past five years, and a statement of the qualifications of the prospective candidate; (3) the class and number of shares of our Common Stock, if any, which are beneficially owned by the prospective candidate; (4) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and the prospective candidate pursuant to which the nomination is to be made by the shareholder if the shareholder and the prospective candidate are different individuals; (5) the candidate’s signed consent to

serve as a director if elected and to be named in ~~the~~our proxy statement; (6) a signed certificate providing the class and number of shares of our Common Stock which are beneficially owned by the shareholder; and (7) any other

information that is required to be provided by the shareholder pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act. Once the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee receives the shareholder recommendation, it may deliver to the prospective candidate a questionnaire that requests additional information about the candidate’s independence, qualifications and other matters, including a possible interview, that would assist the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee in evaluating the candidate, as well as certain information that must be disclosed about the candidate in our proxy statement or other regulatory filings, if nominated.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will not evaluate candidates differently based on who has made the recommendation. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider candidates from any reasonable source, in addition to shareholder recommendations. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has the authority under its charter to hire and pay a fee to consultants or search firms to assist in the process of identifying and evaluating candidates. No such consultants or search firms were used for the slate of director nominees up for election at the Annual Meeting since all directors nominated are for re-election, and, accordingly, no fees have been paid to consultants or search firms in the ~~past~~2011 fiscal year.

We have not received a director nominee recommendation from any shareholder (or group of shareholders) that beneficially owns more than five percent of our Common Stock.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our Common Stock (collectively, “Reporting Persons”) to file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our Common Stock with the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market. Copies of these reports are also required to be delivered to us. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” above for identification of those persons who qualify as “Reporting Persons.”

We believe, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports received or written representations from certain Reporting Persons, that during the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, all Reporting Persons complied with all applicable filing requirements.

Our Board of Directors adopted a ~~code~~Code of ~~business conduct~~Business Conduct and ~~ethics,~~Ethics, which was most recently amended and restated on December 9, 2010. This code applies to all of our employees and our non-employee directors and is posted on our website at www.mgrc.com under the Investor Relations section. The code satisfies the “Code of Ethics” requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as well as the “Code of Conduct” requirements under the Market Place Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The code, among other things, addresses issues relating to conflicts of interests, including internal reporting violations and disclosures, and compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. The purpose of the code is to promote, among other things, honest and ethical conduct, full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable public disclosures, compliance with applicable laws or regulations and to ensure to the greatest possible extent that our business is conducted in a legal and ethical manner. Any waivers or approvals granted under this code with respect to our executive officers and directors may be granted only by the Board of Directors. In addition, any waivers or approvals relating to the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer or controller, or any person performing similar functions, must also be obtained from the Audit Committee. Any waivers or approvals to the code with respect to the remainder of the employees may be granted by our compliance officer, who is currently Randle F. Rose. Any amendments to the code will be promptly disclosed to our shareholders. Our Audit Committee has also established procedures for (a) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (b) the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

Grant Thornton LLP has been selected by the Audit Committee to be the Company’s independent auditors for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2011.~~2012. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the SEC promulgated thereunder, the Audit Committee is solely responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent auditors and shareholders are not required to ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP. However, we are submitting the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent auditors to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that ratification of this selection of independent auditors is not approved by a majority of the shares of Common Stock voting at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, the Audit Committee will review our future selection of independent auditors. Even if the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP is ratified by our shareholders, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent auditor at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

A representative of Grant Thornton LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. The representative will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Grant Thornton LLP performed services for the Company in fiscal years ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2010~~2011 related to financial statement audit work, quarterly reviews, quarterly earnings release reviews and tax services. Fees related to services rendered by Grant Thornton LLP for fiscal years ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2010~~2011 were as follows:


	2009		2010		2010		2011
Audit Fees(1)	$	1,183,837	$	1,168,182	$	1,168,182	$	1,262,903
Audit-Related Fees	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Tax Fees	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
All Other Fees	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0

Total	$	1,183,837	$	1,168,182	$	1,168,182	$	1,262,903

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all audit and non-audit services performed by Grant Thornton LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee to assure that such services do not impair the auditors’ independence from the Company. In April 2004, the Audit Committee adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy which sets forth the procedures and conditions pursuant to which audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors are to be pre-approved. Pursuant to the policy, certain services or categories of services described in detail in the policy may be pre-approved generally on an annual basis together with pre-approved maximum fee levels for such services. The services eligible for annual pre-approval consist of audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. If not pre-approved on an annual basis, proposed services must

otherwise be separately approved prior to being performed by the independent auditors. The Audit Committee

may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. In addition, any services that receive annual pre-approval but exceed the pre-approved maximum fee level also will require separate approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate authority to pre-approve audit and non-audit services to any member of the Audit Committee, but may not delegate such authority to management. The Company’s independent auditors and Chief Financial Officer are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with the pre-approval policy and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee pre-approved all of the audit, audit-related, tax and all other services described as Audit Fees in the table above.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company’s previous filings under the Securities Act ~~of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),~~ or the Exchange Act, that might incorporate future filings, including this Proxy Statement, with the SEC, in whole or in part, the following report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filings, nor shall the following report be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange ~~Act.~~Act, unless specifically stated to be incorporated by reference therein.

The Audit Committee currently has four members, consisting of four independent directors, William J. Dawson, Robert C. Hood, Robert P. McGrath and Ronald H. Zech. The Company’s management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls, financial reporting, compliance with laws and regulations and ethical business standards. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ~~of Directors’~~(“PCAOB”) (United States) ~~generally accepted auditing standards~~ and to issue reports thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes as well as the independence and performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. However, the members of the Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and are not experts in the fields of accounting or auditing. They rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management and the independent ~~auditor.~~auditors.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock present or represented at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent auditors for the year ~~2011.~~2012. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and broker “non-votes,” if any, will have no effect on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF GRANT THORNTON LLP.

The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 or (“the Dodd-Frank ~~Act,~~Act”) added Section 14A to the Exchange Act, which requires that we provide our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules.

As described in detail under the heading “Executive Compensation and Other Information—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain exceptional talent, reward past performance and establish and reward measurable objectives for future performance. Our primary objective is to align our executive officers’ interests with the interests of our shareholders by rewarding achievement of established goals that contribute to increased long-term shareholder value. Please read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 2120 of this Proxy Statement for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about the fiscal year 2011 compensation of our named executive officers.

As part of designing and implementing the compensation programs for all employees, the Company considers the risks that may be created and whether any such risks may have an adverse impact on the Company, and whether, overall, the Company’s compensation programs are reasonably likely to have a material adverse ~~impact.~~impact on the Company. In making this determination, the Company considers the overall mix of compensation for employees as well as the various risk control and mitigation features of our compensation plans, including appropriate performance measures and targets and incentive plan payout maximums.

The Compensation Committee continually reviews the compensation programs ~~for~~applicable to our named executive officers to ensure they achieve the desired goals of aligning our executive compensation structure with our shareholders’ interests and current market practices. As a result of its review process, the Compensation Committee made the following changes to our executive compensation practices:

A more complete explanation of these changes is included in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement.

We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to indicate whether they approve of our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific element of compensation, but rather relates to the overall

compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules. Accordingly, we will ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the ~~2011~~2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”

The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock present or represented at the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and broker “non-votes,” if any, will have no effect on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

~~NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE REGARDING THE FREQUENCY OF VOTING ON THE COMPENSATION~~AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE COMPANY’S ~~NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS~~2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

The Dodd-Frank Act added Section 14A to the Exchange Act, which requires that we provide our shareholders with the opportunity to vote, on an advisotry, non-binding basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek an advisory, non-binding vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules. By voting on this proposal, shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation once every one, two, or three years. Shareholders may also abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.Background

~~After careful consideration of this proposal,~~On March 9, 2007, the Board of Directors ~~has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every year is~~approved the ~~most appropriate alternative~~original McGrath RentCorp 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) in order for the Company to grant a broader range of equity based awards by replacing the 1998 Plan, which only provided for the grant of stock options, and ~~therefore~~the 2000 Long-Term Bonus Plan (the “2000 Plan”), which only provided for the grant of stock bonuses to officers and key employees. The 2007 Plan was amended and restated effective June 4, 2009, subject to shareholder approval, in order to increase the maximum aggregate number of shares which could be issued pursuant to all awards thereunder and to decrease the maximum term of awards which may be issued under the 2007 Plan. In February 2012, the Board of Directors ~~recommends~~unanimously approved amendments to the 2007 Plan, effective as of and subject to shareholder approval, in order to make certain changes described below under the caption “Proposed Amendments.”

The purpose of the 2007 Plan is to retain key employees, consultants and directors of the Company having experience and ability, to attract new employees, consultants and directors whose services are considered valuable, and to encourage the sense of proprietorship and to stimulate the active interest of such persons in the development and financial success of the Company and its subsidiaries. All of our employees, consultants and directors are eligible to participate in the 2007 Plan. The Board believes that ~~you vote for a one-year frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation.~~

~~In formulating its recommendation, the~~grants of options and other forms of equity participation may become an increasingly important means to retain and compensate employees, consultants and directors. The Board of Directors ~~considered~~believes that ~~an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our shareholders~~the proposed amendment and restatement to ~~provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in~~ the proxy statement every year. Additionally, an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is consistent with our policy of seeking input from, and engaging in discussions with, our shareholders on corporate governance matters and our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices. We understand that our shareholders may have different views as to what is the best approach for the Company, and we look forward to hearing from our shareholders on this proposal.

You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of “EVERY ONE YEAR,” “EVERY TWO YEARS,” “EVERY THREE YEARS” or abstain from voting when you vote as specified on the proxy card.

The option of every one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been selected by shareholders. This vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors in any way, and the Board of Directors may decide that it2007 Plan is in the best interests of the Company, consistent with our compensation strategy and essential to the Company’s continued success. The proposed amendments to the 2007 Plan will enable the Company to provide retention incentives to existing personnel and to be flexible and opportunistic in hiring additional personnel that can contribute to the successful development of the Company’s business.

As of December 31, 2011, options and stock appreciation rights covering 3,086,019 shares were outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $23.52 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 3.51 years, and 187,810 RSUs were outstanding. As of December 31, 2011, 547,834 shares remained available for future grant under the 2007 Plan.

The general description of our 2007 Plan below is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the proposed amended and restated 2007 Plan, a copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement asAppendix A and is incorporated herein by reference.

Purpose. The purpose of the 2007 Plan, as stated above, is to provide the Company’s employees, consultants and directors, whose present and potential contributions are important to the success of the Company, an incentive, through ownership of the Company’s Common Stock, to continue in service to the Company, and to help the Company compete effectively with other enterprises for the services of qualified individuals.

Stock Subject to the Plan.The maximum aggregate number of shares which may be issued pursuant to all awards is four million one hundred ninety thousand (4,190,000) shares, plus shares that remained available for grants of awards under the 1998 Plan as of the date the 2007 Plan was originally approved by the Company’s shareholders, plus any shares that would otherwise return to the 1998 Plan as a result of forfeiture, termination or expiration of awards previously granted under the 1998 Plan (ignoring the termination or expiration of the 1998 Plan for the purpose of determining the number of shares available for the 2007 Plan); provided, however, that the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued pursuant to incentive stock options is four million one hundred ninety thousand (4,190,000) shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any shares issued in connection with awards other than options and SARs will be counted against the limit set forth above as two shares for every one share issued in connection with such award.

Any shares covered by an award which is forfeited, canceled or expires shall be deemed not to have been issued for purposes of determining the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be issued under the 2007 Plan. Shares that actually have been issued pursuant to an award shall not be returned to the 2007 Plan and shall not become available for future issuance, except that if unvested shares are forfeited or repurchased by the Company at the lower of their original purchase price or their fair market value, such shares shall become available for future grant. However, (i) shares tendered or withheld in payment of an option exercise price shall not be returned to the 2007 Plan and shall not become available for future issuance; (ii) shares withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation in connection with the exercise of an option or SAR shall not be returned to the 2007 Plan and shall not become available for future issuance; and (iii) all shares covered by the portion of a SAR that is exercised (whether or not shares are actually issued upon exercise of the SAR) shall be considered issued pursuant to the 2007 Plan. Shares withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation in connection with the vesting or settlement of an award other than a stock option or SAR shall be returned to the 2007 Plan and become available for future issuance.

Annual Limits on Certain Awards. The maximum number of shares with respect to which options and stock appreciation rights may be granted to a participant during a calendar year is 1,500,000 shares. For awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units that are intended to be performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the maximum number of shares subject to such awards that may be granted to a participant during a calendar year is 1,000,000 shares. The foregoing limitations shall be adjusted proportionately by the Administrator in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization due to a stock split, stock dividend or similar event affecting the Common Stock of the Company and its determination shall be final, binding and conclusive.

Administration. The 2007 Plan is administered, with respect to grants to employees, directors, officers, and consultants, by the plan administrator (the “Administrator”), defined as the Board or one or more committees designated by the Board. The 2007 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. With respect to grants to officers and directors, the Compensation Committee shall be constituted in such a manner as to satisfy applicable laws, including Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 162(m) of Code.

Terms and Conditions of Awards. The 2007 Plan provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights (collectively referred to as “awards”). Stock options granted under the 2007 Plan may be either incentive stock options under the provisions of Section 422 of the Code, or nonqualified stock options. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees. Awards other than incentive stock options may be granted to employees, directors and consultants of the Company and its related entities. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of shares of the Company’s Common Stock subject to

options designated as incentive stock options which become exercisable for the first time by a participant during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, such excess options shall be treated as nonqualified stock options. If the Code or regulations promulgated thereunder are amended after the date of the 2007 Plan and provide for a different limit on the fair market value of shares permitted to become incentive stock options, such different limit will be automatically incorporated into the 2007 Plan. Under the 2007 Plan, awards may be granted to such employees, directors or consultants who are residing in non-U.S. jurisdictions as the Administrator may determine from time to time. Each award granted under the 2007 Plan shall be designated in an award agreement.

The Administrator may issue awards under the 2007 Plan in settlement, assumption or substitution for outstanding awards or obligations to grant future awards in connection with the Company or a related entity acquiring another entity, or an interest in another entity or an additional interest in a related entity whether by merger, stock purchase, asset purchase or other form of transaction. Subject to applicable laws, the Administrator has the authority, in its discretion, to select employees, consultants and directors to whom awards may be granted from time to time, to determine whether and to what extent awards are granted, to determine the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock or the amount of other consideration to be covered by each award, to approve award agreements for use under the 2007 Plan, to determine the terms and conditions of any award (including the vesting schedule applicable to the award), to amend the terms of any outstanding award granted under the Plan (except for certain amendments that require shareholder approval, as described below), to construe and interpret the terms of the 2007 Plan and awards granted, to establish additional terms, conditions, rules or procedures to accommodate the rules or laws of applicable non-U.S. jurisdictions and to take such other action not inconsistent with the terms of the 2007 Plan, as the Administrator deems appropriate. Additionally, the 2007 Plan provides that dividends payable with respect to all awards of restricted stock that are subject to performance vesting shall be held subject to the vesting of the underlying shares of restricted stock.

The term of any award granted under the 2007 Plan may not be for more than seven (7) years (or five (5) years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to any participant who owns stock representing more than 10% of the combined voting power of the Company or any parent or subsidiary of the Company), excluding any period for which the participant has elected to defer the receipt of the shares or cash issuable pursuant to the award pursuant to a deferral program the Administrator may establish in its discretion.

The 2007 Plan authorizes the Administrator to grant incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options at an exercise price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted (or 110%, in the case of an incentive stock option granted to any employee who owns stock representing more than 10% of the combined voting power of the Company or any parent or subsidiary of the Company). In the case of stock appreciation rights, the base appreciation amount shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. In the case of awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation, the exercise or purchase price, if any, shall be not less than 100% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant. In the case of all other awards granted under the 2007 Plan, the exercise or purchase price shall be determined by the Administrator. The exercise or purchase price is generally payable in cash, check, shares of Common Stock or with respect to options, payment through a broker-dealer sale and remittance procedure or a “net exercise” procedure.

The 2007 Plan provides that any amendment that would adversely affect the participant’s rights under outstanding awards shall not be made without the participant’s written consent, provided, however, that an amendment or modification that may cause an incentive stock option to become a non-qualified stock option shall not be treated as adversely affecting the rights of the participant. The 2007 Plan also provides that shareholder approval is required in order to (i) reduce the exercise price of any option or the base appreciation amount of any stock appreciation right awarded under the 2007 Plan or (ii) cancel any option or stock appreciation right awarded under the 2007 Plan in exchange for another award or for cash at a time when exercise price exceeds the fair market value of the underlying shares unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a Corporate Transaction; provided that canceling an option or SAR in exchange for another award with an exercise price, purchase price or base appreciation amount (as applicable) that is equal to or greater than the exercise price or base appreciation amount (as applicable) of the original option or SAR and with a term no longer than that of the original option or SAR shall not be subject to shareholder approval.

Under the 2007 Plan, the Administrator may establish one or more programs under the 2007 Plan to permit selected participants the opportunity to elect to defer receipt of consideration payable under an award. The Administrator also may establish under the 2007 Plan separate programs for the grant of particular forms of awards to one or more classes of participants.

Termination of Service. An award may not be exercised after the termination date of such award as set forth in the award agreement. In the event a participant in the 2007 Plan terminates continuous service with the Company, an award may be exercised only to the extent provided in the award agreement. Where an award agreement permits a participant to exercise an award following termination of service, the award shall terminate to the extent not exercised on the last day of the specified period or the last day of the original term of the award, whichever comes first. Any award designated as an incentive stock option, to the extent not exercised within the time permitted by law for the exercise of incentive stock options following the termination of employment, shall convert automatically to a nonqualified stock option and thereafter shall be exercisable as such to the extent exercisable by its terms for the period specified in the award agreement.

Transferability of Awards. Under the 2007 Plan, incentive stock options may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution and may be exercised during the lifetime of the participant only by the participant. Other awards shall be transferable only by will and by the laws of descent and distribution and during the lifetime of a participant, to the extent and in the manner authorized by the Administrator, but only to the extent such transfers are made to family members, to family trusts, to family controlled entities, to charitable organizations, and pursuant to domestic relations orders or agreements, in all cases without payment for such transfers to the participant. The 2007 Plan permits the designation of beneficiaries by holders of awards, including incentive stock options.

Section 162(m) of the Code. The maximum number of shares with respect to which options and stock appreciation rights may be granted to a participant during a calendar year is 1,500,000 shares. The foregoing limitation shall be adjusted proportionately by the Administrator in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization due to a stock split, stock dividend or similar event affecting the common stock of the Company and its determination shall be final, binding and conclusive. Under Code Section 162(m) no deduction is allowed in any taxable year of the Company for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the Company’s “covered employees.” An exception to this rule applies to compensation that is paid to a covered employee pursuant to a stock incentive plan approved by shareholders and that specifies, among other things, the maximum number of shares with respect to which options and stock appreciation rights may be granted to eligible participants under such plan during a specified period. Compensation paid pursuant to options or stock appreciation rights granted under such a plan and with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant is deemed to be inherently performance-based, since such awards provide value to participants only if the stock price appreciates. To the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code or the regulations thereunder, in applying the foregoing limitation, if any option or stock appreciation right is canceled, the canceled award shall continue to count against the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which an award may be granted to a participant.

For awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units that are intended to be performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the maximum number of shares subject to such awards that may be granted to a participant during a calendar year is 1,000,000 shares. The foregoing limitation shall be adjusted proportionately by the Administrator in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization due to a stock split, stock dividend or similar event affecting the common stock of the Company and its determination shall be final, binding and conclusive. In order for restricted stock and restricted stock units to qualify as performance-based compensation, the Administrator must establish a performance goal with respect to such award in writing not later than 90 days after the commencement of the services to which it relates and while the outcome is substantially uncertain. In addition, the performance goal must be stated in terms of an objective formula or standard.

Under Code Section 162(m) as currently interpreted by the Internal Revenue Service, a “covered employee” is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the three other most highly compensated officers of the Company, other than the Chief Financial Officer.

The 2007 Plan includes the following performance criteria that may be considered by the Administrator when granting performance-based awards: (i) increase in or maintenance of share price, (ii) earnings per share, (iii) total shareholder return, (iv) operating margin, (v) gross margin, (vi) return on equity, (vii) return on assets, (viii) return on investment, (ix) operating income, (x) net operating income, (xi) recruitment or retention of personnel, (xii) cash flow, (xiii) gross or net revenue, (xiv) expenses, (xv) earnings (including earnings before taxes; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation; earnings before interest, taxes and amortization; or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) (xvi) economic value added, (xvii) market share, (xviii) profit (including gross profit, operating profit or pre-tax profit); (xix) costs, (xx) expenses, (xxi) funds from operations, (xxii) working capital, (xxiii) market share, (xxiv) debt levels or reduction, (xxv) customer retention, (xxvi) sales, (xxvii) operating efficiency, (xxviii) customer satisfaction and/or growth, (xxix) employee satisfaction, (xxx) financing and other capital-raising transactions, and (xxxi) year-end cash. In addition, the performance criteria shall be calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but excluding the effect of any change in accounting standards and any extraordinary, unusual or nonrecurring item occurring after the establishment of the performance criteria applicable to the award. Each such adjustment, if any, shall be made solely for the purpose of providing a consistent basis from period to period for the calculation of performance criteria in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights with respect to an award.

Change in Capitalization. Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, the number of shares of Common Stock covered by outstanding awards, the number of shares of Common Stock that have been authorized for issuance under the 2007 Plan, the exercise or purchase price of each outstanding award, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted subject to awards to any participant in a calendar year, and the like, shall be proportionally adjusted by the Administrator in the event of (i) any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, combination or reclassification or similar event affecting the Common Stock of the Company, (ii) any other increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company or (iii) any other transaction with respect to Common Stock including a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation (including a spin-off or other distribution of stock or property), reorganization, liquidation (whether partial or complete), distribution of cash or other assets to shareholders other than a normal cash dividend, or any similar transaction; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.” In the event of any distribution of cash or other assets to stockholders other than a normal cash dividend, the Administrator shall also make such adjustments or substitute, exchange or grant awards to effect such adjustments. Any such adjustments to outstanding awards will be effected in a manner that precludes the enlargement of rights and benefits under such awards.

Corporate Transaction. Effective upon the consummation of a Corporate Transaction, all outstanding awards shall terminate. However, all such awards shall not terminate to the extent the contractual obligations represented by the awards are assumed by the successor entity. Except as provided in an individual award agreement, for the portion of each award that is assumed by the successor corporation, such portion of the award will automatically vest and become exercisable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights immediately upon termination of a participant’s continuous service if terminated without “cause” (as defined in the 2007 Plan) within twelve (12) months after such Corporate Transaction. For the portion of each award that is not assumed by the successor corporation, such portion of the award will automatically vest and become exercisable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights immediately prior to the effective date of the Corporate Transaction. For awards that have an exercise feature, the portion of the award that is not assumed will terminate if not exercised prior to the Corporate Transaction.

Change in Control. Except as provided in an individual award agreement, following a Change in Control (other than a Change in Control that is also a Corporate Transaction) and upon a participant’s termination of continuous service without cause within twelve (12) months after such Change in Control, each outstanding award of such participant will automatically become fully vested and exercisable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights immediately upon such termination.

Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the 2007 Plan. The Board may at any time amend, suspend or terminate the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan, as proposed to be amended and restated, will have a term of ten (10) years from the date in 2012 that the shareholders approve the amendment and restatement, unless sooner terminated by the Board. To the extent necessary to comply with applicable provisions of federal securities laws, state corporate and securities laws, the Code, the rules of any applicable stock exchange or national market system, and the rules of any non-U.S. jurisdiction applicable to awards granted to residents therein, the Company shall obtain shareholder approval of any such amendment to the 2007 Plan in such a manner and to such a degree as is required.

Nonexclusivity of the Plan. Neither the adoption of the 2007 Plan by the Board of Directors, the submission of the 2007 Plan to the shareholders of the Company for approval, nor any provision of the 2007 Plan will be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board of Directors to adopt such additional compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable, including, without limitation, the granting of awards otherwise than under the 2007 Plan, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.

The following summary of the federal income tax consequences of the 2007 Plan and the awards granted thereunder is based upon federal income tax laws in effect on the date of this Proxy Statement. This summary does not purport to be complete, and does not discuss non-U.S., state or local tax consequences or additional guidance that is expected to be issued by the Treasury Department under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Nonqualified Stock Options. The grant of a nonqualified stock option under the 2007 Plan will not result in any federal income tax consequences to the option holder or to the Company. Upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the option holder is subject to income taxes at the rate applicable to ordinary compensation income on the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise. This income is subject to withholding for federal income and employment tax purposes. The Company is entitled to an income tax deduction in the amount of the income recognized by the option holder, subject to possible limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code and so long as the Company withholds the appropriate taxes with respect to such income (if required) and the option holder’s total compensation is deemed reasonable in amount. Any gain or loss on the option holder’s subsequent disposition of the shares of Common Stock will receive long or short-term capital gain or loss treatment, depending on whether the shares are held for more than one year following exercise. The Company does not receive a tax deduction for any such gain.

In the event a nonqualified stock option is amended, such option may be considered deferred compensation and subject to the rules of Section 409A of the Code, which provides rules regarding the timing of payment of deferred compensation. An option subject to Section 409A of the Code which fails to comply with the rules of Section 409A may result in the acceleration of income recognition, a 20% additional tax obligation, plus penalties and interest.

Incentive Stock Options. The grant of an incentive stock option under the 2007 Plan will not result in any federal income tax consequences to the option holder or the Company. An option holder recognizes no federal taxable income upon exercising an incentive stock option (subject to the alternative minimum tax rules discussed below), and the Company ~~to hold~~receives no deduction at the time of exercise. In the event of a disposition of stock acquired upon exercise of an ~~advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than~~incentive stock option, the tax consequences depend upon how long the option ~~approved by our shareholders. However, we look forward~~holder has held the shares of Common Stock. If the option holder does not dispose of the shares within two years after the incentive stock option was granted, nor within one year after the incentive stock option was exercised, the option holder will recognize a long-term capital gain (or loss) equal to ~~hearing from our shareholders~~the difference between the sale price of the shares and the exercise price. The Company is not entitled to any deduction under these circumstances.

If the option holder fails to satisfy either of the foregoing holding periods, he or she must recognize ordinary income in the year of the disposition (referred to as ~~to their preferences~~a “disqualifying disposition”). The amount of such ordinary income generally is the lesser of (i) the difference between the amount realized on the ~~frequency~~disposition and the exercise price or (ii) the difference between the fair market value of the stock on the exercise date and the exercise price. Any gain in excess of the amount taxed as ordinary income will be treated as a long or short-term capital gain, depending on whether the stock was held for more than one year. The Company, in the year of the disqualifying disposition, is entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the option holder, subject to possible limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code and so long as the option holder’s total compensation is deemed reasonable in amount.

The “spread” under an incentive stock option—i.e., the difference between the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise and the exercise price—is classified as an item of adjustment in the year of exercise for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. If an option holder’s alternative minimum tax liability exceeds such option holder’s regular income tax liability, the option holder will owe the larger amount of taxes. In order to avoid the application of alternative minimum tax with respect to incentive stock options, the option holder must sell the shares within the same calendar year in which the incentive stock options are exercised. However, such a sale of shares within the same year of exercise will constitute a disqualifying disposition, as described above.

In the event an incentive stock option is amended, such option may be considered deferred compensation and subject to the rules of Section 409A of the Code. An option subject to Section 409A of the Code which fails to comply with the rules of Section 409A can result in the acceleration of income recognition, a 20% additional tax obligation, plus penalties and interest. In addition, the amendment of an ~~advisory vote~~incentive stock option may convert the option from an incentive stock option to a nonqualified stock option.

Restricted Stock. The grant of restricted stock will subject the recipient to ordinary compensation income on the difference between the amount paid for such stock and the fair market value of the shares on the date that the restrictions lapse. This income is subject to withholding for federal income and employment tax purposes. The Company is entitled to an income tax deduction in the amount of the ordinary income recognized by the recipient, subject to possible limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code and so long as the Company withholds the appropriate taxes with respect to such income (if required) and the recipient’s total compensation is deemed reasonable in amount. Any gain or loss on the recipient’s subsequent disposition of the shares will receive long or short-term capital gain or loss treatment depending on how long the stock has been held since the restrictions lapsed. The Company does not receive a tax deduction for any such gain.

Recipients of restricted stock may make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code (a “Section 83(b) Election”) to recognize as ordinary compensation income in the year that such restricted stock is granted, the amount equal to the spread between the amount paid for such stock and the fair market value on the date of the issuance of the stock. If such an election is made, the recipient recognizes no further amounts of compensation income upon the lapse of any restrictions and any gain or loss on subsequent disposition will be long or short-term capital gain to the recipient. A Section 83(b) Election must be made within 30 days from the time the restricted stock is issued.

Stock Appreciation Rights. Recipients of SARs generally should not recognize income until a SAR is exercised (assuming there is no ceiling on the value of the right). Upon exercise, the recipient will normally recognize taxable ordinary income for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of cash and fair market value of the shares, if any, received upon such exercise. Recipients who are employees will be subject to withholding for federal income and employment tax purposes with respect to income recognized upon exercise of a SAR. Recipients will recognize gain upon the disposition of any shares received on exercise of a SAR equal to the excess of (i) the amount realized on such disposition over (ii) the ordinary income recognized with respect to such shares under the principles set forth above. That gain will be taxable as long or short-term capital gain depending on whether the shares were held for more than one year. The Company will be entitled to a tax deduction to the extent and in the year that ordinary income is recognized by the recipient, subject to possible limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code and so long as the Company withholds the appropriate taxes with respect to such income (if required) and the recipient’s total compensation is deemed reasonable in amount.

In the event a SAR is amended, such SAR may be considered deferred compensation and subject to the rules of Section 409A of the Code. A SAR subject to Section 409A of the Code which fails to comply with the rules of Section 409A may result in the acceleration of income recognition, a 20% additional tax obligation, plus penalties and interest.

Restricted Stock Units. Recipients of restricted stock units generally should not recognize income until such units are converted into cash or shares of stock. Upon conversion, the recipient will normally recognize taxable ordinary income for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of cash and fair market value of the shares, if any, received upon such conversion. Recipients who are employees will be subject to withholding for federal income and employment tax purposes with respect to income recognized upon conversion of the restricted stock units. Participants will recognize gain upon the disposition of any shares received upon conversion of the restricted stock units equal to the excess of (i) the amount realized on such disposition over (ii) the ordinary income recognized with respect to such shares under the principles set forth above. That gain will be taxable as long or short-term capital gain depending on whether the shares were held for more than one year. The Company will be entitled to a tax deduction to the extent and in the year that ordinary income is recognized by the recipient, subject to possible limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code and so long as the Company withholds the appropriate taxes with respect to such income (if required) and the recipient’s total compensation is deemed reasonable in amount.

Restricted stock units also can be considered non-qualified deferred compensation and subject to the rules of Section 409A of the Code. A restricted stock unit subject to Section 409A of the Code which fails to comply with the rules of Section 409A may result in the acceleration of income recognition, a 20% additional tax obligation, plus penalties and interest.

Awards under the 2007 Plan are subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received in the future by participants in the 2007 Plan.

The following table shows the number of restricted stock units, SARs and stock options which we have awarded as of December 31, 2011, to the following individuals and groups:

~~A plurality~~The affirmative vote of the ~~votes cast will determine~~holders of a majority of the ~~frequency of voting on the compensation~~shares of the Company’s ~~named executive officers that will be deemed~~Common Stock present or represented at the ~~choice~~Annual Meeting is required to approve the amendment and restatement of the ~~shareholders.~~2007 Plan. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and broker “non-votes,” if any, will have no effect on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE ~~OPTION OFEVERY ONE YEAR~~ ~~AS THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH SHAREHOLDERS ARE PROVIDED A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, AS DISCLOSED PURSUANT~~AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT TO THE ~~COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.~~2007 PLAN.

The Board of Directors knows of no other business which will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that proxies in the enclosed form will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the judgments of the persons voting the proxies.

1.Purposes of the Plan. The purposes of this Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel, to provide additional incentives to Employees, Directors and Consultants and to promote the success of the Company’s business.

2.Definitions. The following definitions shall apply as used herein and in the individual Award Agreements except as defined otherwise in an individual Award Agreement. In the event a term is separately defined in an individual Award Agreement, such definition shall supercede the definition contained in this Section 2.

(a) “Administrator” means the Board or any of the Committees appointed to administer the Plan.

(b) “Affiliate” and “Associate” shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

(c) “Applicable Laws” means the legal requirements relating to the Plan and the Awards under applicable provisions of federal securities laws, state corporate and securities laws, the Code, the rules of any applicable stock exchange or national market system, and the rules of any non-U.S. jurisdiction applicable to Awards granted to residents therein.

(d) “Assumed” means that pursuant to a Corporate Transaction either (i) the Award is expressly affirmed by the Company or (ii) the contractual obligations represented by the Award are expressly assumed (and not simply by operation of law) by the successor entity or its Parent in connection with the Corporate Transaction with appropriate adjustments to the number and type of securities of the successor entity or its Parent subject to the Award and the exercise or purchase price thereof which at least preserves the compensation element of the Award existing at the time of the Corporate Transaction as determined in accordance with the instruments evidencing the agreement to assume the Award.

(e) “Award” means the grant of an Option, SAR, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit or other right or benefit under the Plan.

(f) “Award Agreement” means the written agreement evidencing the grant of an Award executed by the Company and the Grantee, including any amendments thereto.

(h) “Cause” means, with respect to the termination by the Company or a Related Entity of the Grantee’s Continuous Service, that such termination is for “Cause” as such term (or word of like import) is expressly defined in a then-effective written agreement between the Grantee and the Company or such Related Entity, or in the absence of such then-effective written agreement and definition, is based on, in the determination of the Administrator, the Grantee’s: (i) performance of any act or failure to perform any act in bad faith and to the detriment of the Company or a Related Entity; (ii) dishonesty, intentional misconduct or material breach of any agreement with the Company or a Related Entity; or (iii) commission of a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or physical or emotional harm to any person; provided, however, that with regard to any agreement that defines “Cause” on the occurrence of or in connection with a Corporate Transaction or a Change in Control, such definition of “Cause” shall not apply until a Corporate Transaction or a Change in Control actually occurs.

(i) “Change in Control” means a change in ownership or control of the Company effected through either of the following transactions:

(i) the direct or indirect acquisition by any person or related group of persons (other than an acquisition from or by the Company or by a Company-sponsored employee benefit plan or by a person that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Company) of

beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) of securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding securities pursuant to a tender or exchange offer made directly to the Company’s shareholders which a majority of the Continuing Directors who are not Affiliates or Associates of the offeror do not recommend such shareholders accept, or

(ii) a change in the composition of the Board over a period of twelve (12) months or less such that a majority of the Board members (rounded up to the next whole number) ceases, by reason of one or more contested elections for Board membership, to be comprised of individuals who are Continuing Directors.

(k) “Committee” means any committee composed of members of the Board appointed by the Board to administer the Plan.

(m) “Company” means McGrath RentCorp, ~~IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION 000004 ENDORSEMENT_LINE_______ _______ SAC KPACK_____________ MR~~a California corporation, or any successor entity that adopts the Plan in connection with a Corporate Transaction.

(n) “Consultant” means any person (other than an Employee or a Director, solely with respect to rendering services in such person’s capacity as a Director) who is engaged by the Company or any Related Entity to render consulting or advisory services to the Company or such Related Entity.

(o) “Continuing Directors” means members of the Board who either (i) have been Board members continuously for a period of at least twelve (12) months or (ii) have been Board members for less than twelve (12) months and were elected or nominated for election as Board members by at least a majority of the Board members described in clause (i) who were still in office at the time such election or nomination was approved by the Board.

(p) “Continuous Service” means that the provision of services to the Company or a Related Entity in any capacity of Employee, Director or Consultant is not interrupted or terminated. In jurisdictions requiring notice in advance of an effective termination as an Employee, Director or Consultant, Continuous Service shall be deemed terminated upon the actual cessation of providing services to the Company or a Related Entity notwithstanding any required notice period that must be fulfilled before a termination as an Employee, Director or Consultant can be effective under Applicable Laws. A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 C123456789 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext UsingGrantee’s Continuous Service shall be deemed to have terminated either upon an actual termination of Continuous Service or upon the entity for which the Grantee provides services ceasing to be a ~~black ink pen, mark your votes~~Related Entity. Continuous Service shall not be considered interrupted in the case of (i) any approved leave of absence, (ii) transfers among the Company, any Related Entity, or any successor, in any capacity of Employee, Director or Consultant, or (iii) any change in status as long as the individual remains in the service of the Company or a Related Entity in any capacity of Employee, Director or Consultant (except as otherwise provided in the Award Agreement). An approved leave of absence shall include sick leave, military leave, or any other authorized personal leave. For purposes of each Incentive Stock Option granted under the Plan, if such leave exceeds three (3) months, and reemployment upon expiration of such leave is not guaranteed by statute or contract, then the Incentive Stock Option shall be treated as a Non-Qualified Stock Option on the day three (3) months and one (1) day following the expiration of such three (3) month period.

(q) “Corporate Transaction” means any of the following transactions, provided, however, that the Administrator shall determine under parts (iv) and (v) whether multiple transactions are related, and its determination shall be final, binding and conclusive:

(i) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving entity, except for a transaction the principal purpose of which is to change the state in which the Company is incorporated;

(ii) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company;

(iv) any reverse merger or series of related transactions culminating in a reverse merger (including, but not limited to, a tender offer followed by a reverse merger) in which the Company is the surviving entity but (A) the shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger are converted or exchanged by virtue of the merger into other property, whether in the form of securities, cash or otherwise, or (B) in which securities possessing more than forty percent (40%) of the total combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding securities are transferred to a person or persons different from those who held such securities immediately prior to such merger or the initial transaction culminating in such merger; or

(v) acquisition in a single or series of related transactions by any person or related group of persons (other than the Company or by a Company-sponsored employee benefit plan) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) of securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding securities but excluding any such transaction or series of related transactions that the Administrator determines shall not be a Corporate Transaction.

(r) “Covered Employee” means an Employee who is a “covered employee” under Section 162(m)(3) of the Code.

(s) “Director” means a member of the Board or the board of directors of any Related Entity.

(t) “Disability” means as defined under the long-term disability policy of the Company or the Related Entity to which the Grantee provides services regardless of whether the Grantee is covered by such policy. If the Company or the Related Entity to which the Grantee provides service does not have a long-term disability plan in place, “Disability” means that a Grantee is unable to carry out the responsibilities and functions of the position held by the Grantee by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment for a period of not less than ninety (90) consecutive days. A Grantee will not be considered to have incurred a Disability unless he or she furnishes proof of such impairment sufficient to satisfy the Administrator in its discretion.

(u) “Employee” means any person, including an Officer or Director, who is in the employ of the Company or any Related Entity, subject to the control and direction of the Company or any Related Entity as to both the work to be performed and the manner and method of performance. The payment of a director’s fee by the Company or a Related Entity shall not be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company.

(w) “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows:

(i) If the Common Stock is listed on one or more established stock exchanges or national market systems, including without limitation The NASDAQ Global Select Market, The NASDAQ Global Market or The NASDAQ Capital Market of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, its Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on the principal exchange or system on which the Common Stock is listed (as determined by the Administrator) on the date of determination (or, if no closing sales price or closing bid was reported on that date, as applicable, on the last trading date such closing sales price or closing bid was reported), as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable;

(ii) If the Common Stock is regularly quoted on an automated quotation system (including the OTC Bulletin Board) or by a recognized securities dealer, its Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for such stock as quoted on such system or by such securities dealer on the date of determination, but if selling prices are not reported, the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock shall be the mean between the high bid and low asked prices for the Common Stock on the date of determination (or, if no such prices were reported on that date, on the last date such prices were reported), as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable; or

(iii) In the absence of an established market for the Common Stock of the type described in (i) and (ii), above, the Fair Market Value thereof shall be determined by the Administrator in good faith.

(x) “Grantee” means an Employee, Director or Consultant who receives an Award under the Plan.

(y) “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code

(z) “Non-Qualified Stock Option” means an Option not intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.

(aa) “Officer” means a person who is an officer of the Company or a Related Entity within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

(bb) “Option” means an option to purchase Shares pursuant to an Award Agreement granted under the Plan.

(cc) “Parent” means a “parent corporation”, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(e) of the Code.

(dd) “Performance-Based Compensation” means compensation qualifying as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(gg) “Replaced” means that pursuant to a Corporate Transaction the Award is replaced with a comparable stock award or a cash incentive program of the Company, the successor entity (if applicable) or Parent of either of them which preserves the compensation element of such Award existing at the time of the Corporate Transaction and provides for subsequent payout in accordance with the same (or a more favorable) vesting schedule applicable to such Award. The determination of Award comparability shall be made by the Administrator and its determination shall be final, binding and conclusive.

(hh) “Restricted Stock” means Shares issued under the Plan to the Grantee for such consideration, if any, and subject to such restrictions on transfer, rights of first refusal, repurchase provisions, forfeiture provisions, and other terms and conditions as established by the Administrator. Dividends payable with respect to Restricted Stock that is subject to performance vesting shall be held subject to the vesting of the underlying Shares.

(ii) “Restricted Stock Units” means an Award which may be earned in whole or in part upon the passage of time or the attainment of performance criteria established by the Administrator and which may be settled for cash, Shares or other securities or a combination of cash, Shares or other securities as established by the Administrator.

(jj) “Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act or any successor thereto.

(kk) “SAR” means a stock appreciation right entitling the Grantee to Shares or cash compensation, as established by the Administrator, measured by appreciation in the value of Common Stock.

(mm) “Subsidiary” means a “subsidiary corporation”, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.

(a) Subject to the provisions of Section 10, below, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards is four million one hundred ninety thousand (4,190,000) Shares, plus the number of Shares that remain available for grants of awards under the Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”) as of the date the Plan was originally approved by the Company’s shareholders, plus

any Shares that would otherwise return to the 1998 Plan as a result of forfeiture, termination or expiration of awards previously granted under the 1998 Plan (ignoring the termination or expiration of the 1998 Plan for the purpose of determining the number of Shares available for the Plan); provided, however, that the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Incentive Stock Options is four million one hundred ninety thousand (4,190,000) Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Shares issued in connection with Awards other than Options and SARs shall be counted against the limit set forth herein as two (2) Shares for every one (1) Share issued in connection with such Award (and shall be counted as two (2) Shares for every one (1) Share returned or deemed not have been issued from the Plan pursuant to Section 3(b) below in connection with Awards other than Options and SARs). The Shares to be issued pursuant to Awards may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.

(b) Any Shares covered by an Award (or portion of an Award) which is forfeited, canceled or expires (whether voluntarily or involuntarily) shall be deemed not to have been issued for purposes of determining the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan. Shares that have been issued under the Plan pursuant to an Award shall not be returned to the Plan and shall not become available for future issuance under the Plan, except that if unvested Shares are forfeited, or repurchased by the Company at the lower of their original purchase price or their Fair Market Value at the time of repurchase, such Shares shall become available for future grant under the Plan. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein: (i) Shares tendered or withheld in payment of an Option exercise price shall not be returned to the Plan and shall not become available for future issuance under the Plan; (ii) Shares withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation in connection with the exercise of an Option or SAR shall not be returned to the Plan and shall not become available for future issuance under the Plan; and (iii) all Shares covered by the portion of an SAR that is exercised (whether or not Shares are actually issued to the Grantee upon exercise of the SAR) shall be considered issued pursuant to the Plan. Shares withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation in connection with the vesting or settlement of an Award other than Option or SAR shall be returned to the Plan and become available for future issuance under the Plan.

(i)Administration with Respect to Directors and Officers. With respect to grants of Awards to Directors or Employees who are also Officers or Directors of the Company, the Plan shall be administered by (A) the Board or (B) a Committee designated by the Board, which Committee shall be constituted in such a manner as to satisfy the Applicable Laws and to permit such grants and related transactions under the Plan to be exempt from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act in accordance with Rule 16b-3. Once appointed, such Committee shall continue to serve in its designated capacity until otherwise directed by the Board.

(ii)Administration With Respect to Consultants and Other Employees. With respect to grants of Awards to Employees or Consultants who are neither Directors nor Officers of the Company, the Plan shall be administered by (A) the Board or (B) a Committee designated by the Board, which Committee shall be constituted in such a manner as to satisfy the Applicable Laws. Once appointed, such Committee shall continue to serve in its designated capacity until otherwise directed by the Board. The Board may authorize one or more Officers to grant such Awards and may limit such authority as the Board determines from time to time.

(iii)Administration With Respect to Covered Employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, grants of Awards to any Covered Employee intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall be made only by a Committee (or subcommittee of a Committee) which is comprised solely of two or more Directors eligible to serve on a committee making Awards qualifying as Performance-Based Compensation. In the case of such Awards granted to Covered Employees, references to the “Administrator” or to a “Committee” shall be deemed to be references to such Committee or subcommittee.

(iv)Administration Errors. In the event an Award is granted in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of this subsection (a), such Award shall be presumptively valid as of its grant date to the extent permitted by the Applicable Laws.

(b)Powers of the Administrator. Subject to Applicable Laws and the provisions of the Plan (including any other powers given to the Administrator hereunder), and except as otherwise provided by the Board, the Administrator shall have the authority, in its discretion:

(i) to select the Employees, Directors and Consultants to whom Awards may be granted from time to time hereunder;

(iii) to determine the number of Shares or the amount of other consideration to be covered by each Award granted hereunder;

(vi) to amend the terms of any outstanding Award granted under the Plan, provided that (A) any amendment that would adversely affect the Grantee’s rights under an outstanding Award shall not be made without the Grantee’s written consent, provided, however, that an amendment or modification that may cause an Incentive Stock Option to become a Non-Qualified Stock Option shall not be treated as adversely affecting the rights of the Grantee, (B) the reduction of the exercise price of any Option awarded under the Plan and the base appreciation amount of any SAR awarded under the Plan shall be subject to shareholder approval and (C) canceling an Option or SAR at a time when its exercise price or base appreciation amount (as applicable) exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares, in exchange for another Option, SAR, Restricted Stock or other Award or for cash shall be subject to shareholder approval, unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a Corporate Transaction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, canceling an Option or SAR in exchange for another Option, SAR, Restricted Stock, or for another Award with an Xexercise price, purchase price or base appreciation amount (as applicable) that is equal to or greater than the exercise price or base appreciation amount (as applicable) of the original Option or SAR and with a term no longer than that of the original Option or SAR shall not be subject to shareholder approval;

(vii) to construe and interpret the terms of the Plan and Awards, including without limitation, any notice of award or Award Agreement, granted pursuant to the Plan;

(viii) to grant Awards to Employees, Directors and Consultants employed outside the United States on such terms and conditions different from those specified in the Plan as ~~shown~~may, in Xthe judgment of the Administrator, be necessary or desirable to further the purpose of the Plan; and

(ix) to take such other action, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Administrator deems appropriate.

The express grant in the Plan of any specific power to the Administrator shall not be construed as limiting any power or authority of the Administrator; provided that the Administrator may not exercise any right or power reserved to the Board. Any decision made, or action taken, by the Administrator or in connection with the administration of this ~~example. Please~~Plan shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons having an interest in the Plan.

(c)Indemnification. In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board or as Officers or Employees of the Company or a Related Entity, members of the Board and any Officers or Employees of the Company or a Related Entity to whom authority to act for the Board, the Administrator or the Company is delegated shall be defended and indemnified by the Company to the extent permitted by law on an after-tax basis against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any claim, investigation, action, suit or

proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan, or any Award granted hereunder, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be adjudged in such claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding that such person is liable for gross negligence, bad faith or intentional misconduct; provided, however, that within thirty (30) days after the institution of such claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, such person shall offer to the Company, in writing, the opportunity at the Company’s expense to defend the same.

5.Eligibility. Awards other than Incentive Stock Options may be granted to Employees, Directors and Consultants. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees of the Company or a Parent or a Subsidiary of the Company. An Employee, Director or Consultant who has been granted an Award may, if otherwise eligible, be granted additional Awards. Awards may be granted to such Employees, Directors or Consultants who are residing in non-U.S. jurisdictions as the Administrator may determine from time to time.

(a)Types of Awards. The Administrator is authorized under the Plan to award any type of arrangement to an Employee, Director or Consultant that is not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan and that by its terms involves or might involve the issuance of (i) Shares, (ii) cash or (iii) an Option, a SAR, or similar right with a fixed or variable price related to the Fair Market Value of the Shares and with an exercise or conversion privilege related to the passage of time, the occurrence of one or more events, or the satisfaction of performance criteria or other conditions. Such awards include, without limitation, Options, SARs, sales or bonuses of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units, and an Award may consist of one such security or benefit, or two (2) or more of them in any combination or alternative.

(b)Designation of Award. Each Award shall be designated in the Award Agreement. In the case of an Option, the Option shall be designated as either an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option. However, notwithstanding such designation, an Option will qualify as an Incentive Stock Option under the Code only to the extent the $100,000 dollar limitation of Section 422(d) of the Code is not exceeded. The $100,000 limitation of Section 422(d) of the Code is calculated based on the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to Options designated as Incentive Stock Options which become exercisable for the first time by a Grantee during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company). For purposes of this calculation, Incentive Stock Options shall be taken into account in the order in which they were granted, and the Fair Market Value of the Shares shall be determined as of the grant date of the relevant Option. In the event that the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder are amended after the date the Plan becomes effective to provide for a different limit on the Fair Market Value of Shares permitted to be subject to Incentive Stock Options, then such different limit will be automatically incorporated herein and will apply to any Options granted after the effective date of such amendment.

(c)Conditions of Award. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Administrator shall determine the provisions, terms, and conditions of each Award including, but not limited to, the Award vesting schedule, repurchase provisions, rights of first refusal, forfeiture provisions, form of payment (cash, Shares, or other consideration) upon settlement of the Award, payment contingencies, and satisfaction of any performance criteria. The performance criteria established by the Administrator may be based on any one of, or combination of, the following: (i) increase in or maintenance of share price, (ii) earnings per share, (iii) total shareholder return, (iv) operating margin, (v) gross margin, (vi) return on equity, (vii) return on assets, (viii) return on investment, (ix) operating income, (x) net operating income, (xi) recruitment or retention of personnel, (xii) cash flow, (xiii) gross or net revenue, (xiv) expenses, (xv) earnings (including earnings before taxes; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation; earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation; earnings before interest, taxes and amortization; or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) (xvi) economic value added, (xvii) market share, (xviii) profit

(including gross profit, operating profit or pre-tax profit); (xix) costs, (xx) expenses, (xxi) funds from operations, (xxii) working capital, (xxiii) market share, (xxiv) debt levels or reduction, (xxv) customer retention, (xxvi) sales, (xxvii) operating efficiency, (xxviii) customer satisfaction and/or growth, (xxix) employee satisfaction, (xxx) financing and other capital-raising transactions, and (xxxi) year-end cash. The performance criteria may be applicable to the Company, Related Entities and/or any individual business units of the Company or any Related Entity. Partial achievement of the specified criteria may result in a payment or vesting corresponding to the degree of achievement as specified in the Award Agreement. In addition, the performance criteria shall be calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but excluding the effect (whether positive or negative) of any change in accounting standards and any extraordinary, unusual or nonrecurring item, as determined by the Administrator, occurring after the establishment of the performance criteria applicable to the Award intended to be performance-based compensation. Each such adjustment, if any, shall be made solely for the purpose of providing a consistent basis from period to period for the calculation of performance criteria in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the Grantee’s rights with respect to an Award intended to be performance-based compensation.

(d)Acquisitions and Other Transactions. The Administrator may issue Awards under the Plan in settlement, assumption or substitution for, outstanding awards or obligations to grant future awards in connection with the Company or a Related Entity acquiring another entity, an interest in another entity or an additional interest in a Related Entity whether by merger, stock purchase, asset purchase or other form of transaction.

(e)Deferral of Award Payment. The Administrator may establish one or more programs under the Plan to permit selected Grantees the opportunity to elect to defer receipt of consideration upon exercise of an Award, satisfaction of performance criteria, or other event that absent the election would entitle the Grantee to payment or receipt of Shares or other consideration under an Award. The Administrator may establish the election procedures, the timing of such elections, the mechanisms for payments of, and accrual of interest or other earnings, if any, on amounts, Shares or other consideration so deferred, and such other terms, conditions, rules and procedures that the Administrator deems advisable for the administration of any such deferral program.

(f)Separate Programs. The Administrator may establish one or more separate programs under the Plan for the purpose of issuing particular forms of Awards to one or more classes of Grantees on such terms and conditions as determined by the Administrator from time to time.

(i)Individual Limit for Options and SARs. The maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options and SARs may be granted to any Grantee in any calendar year shall be one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000) Shares. The foregoing limitation shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization pursuant to Section 10, below. To the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code or the regulations thereunder, in applying the foregoing limitation with respect to a Grantee, if any Option or SAR is canceled, the canceled Option or SAR shall continue to count against the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options and SARs may be granted to the Grantee. For this purpose, the repricing of an Option (or in the case of a SAR, the base amount on which the stock appreciation is calculated is reduced to reflect a reduction in the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock) shall be treated as the cancellation of the existing Option or SAR and the grant of a new Option or SAR.

(ii)Individual Limit for Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. For awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units that are intended to be Performance-Based Compensation, the maximum number of Shares with respect to which such Awards may be granted to any Grantee in any calendar year shall be one million (1,000,000) Shares. The foregoing limitation shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization pursuant to Section 10, below.

(iii)Deferral. If the vesting or receipt of Shares under an Award is deferred to a later date, any amount (whether denominated in Shares or cash) paid in addition to the original number of Shares subject to such Award will not be treated as an increase in the number of Shares subject to the Award if the additional amount is based either on a reasonable rate of interest or on one or more predetermined actual investments such that the amount payable by the Company at the later date will be based on the actual rate of return of a specific investment (including any decrease as well as any increase in the value of an investment).

(h)Early Exercise. The Award Agreement may, but need not, include a provision whereby the Grantee may elect at any time while an Employee, Director or Consultant to exercise any part or all of the Award prior to full vesting of the Award. Any unvested Shares received pursuant to such exercise may be subject to a repurchase right in favor of the Company or a Related Entity or to any other restriction the Administrator determines to be appropriate.

(i)Term of Award. The term of each Award shall be no more than seven (7) years from the date of grant thereof. However, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Grantee who, at the time the Option is granted, owns stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company, the term of the Incentive Stock Option shall be five (5) years from the date of grant thereof or such shorter term as may be provided in the Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the specified term of any Award shall not include any period for which the Grantee has elected to defer the receipt of the Shares or cash issuable pursuant to the Award.

(j)Transferability of Awards. Incentive Stock Options may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the Grantee, only by the Grantee. Other Awards shall be transferable (i) by will and by the laws of descent and distribution and (ii) during the lifetime of the Grantee, to the extent and in the manner authorized by the Administrator, but only to the extent such transfers are made to family members, to family trusts, to family controlled entities, to charitable organizations, and pursuant to domestic relations orders or agreements, in all cases without payment for such transfers to the Grantee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee may designate one or more beneficiaries of the Grantee’s Award in the event of the Grantee’s death on a beneficiary designation form provided by the Administrator.

(k)Time of Granting Awards. The date of grant of an Award shall for all purposes be the date on which the Administrator makes the determination to grant such Award, or such other date as is determined by the Administrator.

(a)Exercise or Purchase Price. The exercise or purchase price, if any, for an Award shall be as follows:

(A) granted to an Employee who, at the time of the grant of such Incentive Stock Option owns stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company, the per Share exercise price shall be not less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant; or

(B) granted to any Employee other than an Employee described in the preceding paragraph, the per Share exercise price shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.

(ii) In the case of a Non-Qualified Stock Option, the per Share exercise price shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.

(iii) In the case of Awards intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the exercise or purchase price, if any, shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.

(iv) In the case of SARs, the base appreciation amount shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.

(v) In the case of other Awards, such price as is determined by the Administrator.

(vi) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 7(a), in the case of an Award issued pursuant to Section 6(d), above, the exercise or purchase price for the Award shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of the relevant instrument evidencing the agreement to issue such Award.

(b)Consideration. Subject to Applicable Laws, the consideration to be paid for the Shares to be issued upon exercise or purchase of an Award including the method of payment, shall be determined by the Administrator. In addition to any other types of consideration the Administrator may determine, the Administrator is authorized to accept as consideration for Shares issued under the Plan the following:

(iii) surrender of Shares or delivery of a properly executed form of attestation of ownership of Shares as the Administrator may require which have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender or attestation equal to the aggregate exercise price of the Shares as to which said Award shall be exercised;

(iv) with respect to Options, payment through a broker-dealer sale and remittance procedure pursuant to which the Grantee (A) shall provide written instructions to a Company designated brokerage firm to effect the immediate sale of some or all of the purchased Shares and remit to the Company sufficient funds to cover the aggregate exercise price payable for the purchased Shares and (B) shall provide written directives to the Company to deliver the certificates for the purchased Shares directly to such brokerage firm in order to complete the sale transaction; or

(v) with respect to Options, payment through a “net exercise” such that, without the payment of any funds, the Grantee may exercise the Option and receive the net number of Shares equal to (i) the number of Shares as to which the Option is being exercised, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the Fair Market Value per Share (on such date as is determined by the Administrator) less the Exercise Price per Share, and the denominator of which is such Fair Market Value per Share (the number of net Shares to be received shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number of Shares);

The Administrator may at any time or from time to time, by adoption of or by amendment to the standard forms of Award Agreement described in Section 4(b)(iv), or by other means, grant Awards which do not ~~write outside th e~~permit all of the foregoing forms of consideration to be used in payment for the Shares or which otherwise restrict one or more forms of consideration.

(c)Taxes. No Shares shall be delivered under the Plan to any Grantee or other person until such Grantee or other person has made arrangements acceptable to the Administrator for the satisfaction of any non-U.S., federal, state, or local income and employment tax withholding obligations, including, without limitation, obligations incident to the receipt of Shares. Upon exercise or vesting of an Award the Company shall withhold or collect from the Grantee an amount sufficient to satisfy such tax obligations, including, but not limited to, by surrender of the whole number of Shares covered by the Award sufficient to satisfy the minimum applicable tax withholding obligations incident to the exercise or vesting of an Award (reduced to the lowest whole number of Shares if such number of Shares withheld would result in withholding a fractional Share with any remaining tax withholding settled in cash).

(i) Any Award granted hereunder shall be exercisable at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Administrator under the terms of the Plan and specified in the Award Agreement.

(ii) An Award shall be deemed to be exercised when written notice of such exercise has been given to the Company in accordance with the terms of the Award by the person entitled to exercise the Award and full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Award is exercised has been made, including, to the extent selected, use of the broker-dealer sale and remittance procedure to pay the purchase price as provided in Section 7(b)(iv).

(i) An Award may not be exercised after the termination date of such Award set forth in the Award Agreement and may be exercised following the termination of a Grantee’s Continuous Service only to the extent provided in the Award Agreement.

(ii) Where the Award Agreement permits a Grantee to exercise an Award following the termination of the Grantee’s Continuous Service for a specified period, the Award shall terminate to the extent not exercised on the last day of the specified period or the last day of the original term of the Award, whichever occurs first.

(iii) Any Award designated ~~areas. Annual Meeting Proxy Card 3 PLEASE~~as an Incentive Stock Option to the extent not exercised within the time permitted by law for the exercise of Incentive Stock Options following the termination of a Grantee’s Continuous Service shall convert automatically to a Non-Qualified Stock Option and thereafter shall be exercisable as such to the extent exercisable by its terms for the period specified in the Award Agreement.

(a) If at any time the Administrator determines that the delivery of Shares pursuant to the exercise, vesting or any other provision of an Award is or may be unlawful under Applicable Laws, the vesting or right to exercise an Award or to otherwise receive Shares pursuant to the terms of an Award shall be suspended until the Administrator determines that such delivery is lawful and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance. The Company shall have no obligation to effect any registration or qualification of the Shares under federal or state laws.

(b) As a condition to the exercise of an Award, the Company may require the person exercising such Award to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the Shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such a representation is required by any Applicable Laws.

10.Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization. Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, the number of Shares covered by each outstanding Award, and the number of Shares which have been authorized for issuance under the Plan but as to which no Awards have yet been granted or which have been returned to the Plan, the exercise or purchase price of each such outstanding Award, the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Awards may be granted to any Grantee in any calendar year, as well as any other terms that the Administrator determines require adjustment shall be proportionately adjusted for (i) any increase or decrease in the number of issued Shares resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, combination or reclassification of the Shares, or similar transaction affecting the Shares, (ii) any other increase or decrease in the number of issued Shares effected without receipt of consideration by the Company, or (iii) any other transaction with respect to Common Stock including a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation (including a spin-off or other distribution of stock or property), reorganization, liquidation (whether partial or complete) or any similar transaction; provided, however

that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.” In the event of any distribution of cash or other assets to stockholders other than a normal cash dividend, the Administrator shall also make such adjustments as provided in this Section 10 or substitute, exchange or grant Awards to effect such adjustments (collectively “adjustments”). Any such adjustments to outstanding Awards will be effected in a manner that precludes the enlargement of rights and benefits under such Awards. In connection with the foregoing adjustments, the Administrator may, in its discretion, prohibit the exercise of Awards or other issuance of Shares, cash or other consideration pursuant to Awards during certain periods of time. Except as the Administrator determines, no issuance by the Company of shares of any class, or securities convertible into shares of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason hereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price of Shares subject to an Award.

(a)Termination of Award to Extent Not Assumed in Corporate Transaction. Effective upon the consummation of a Corporate Transaction, all outstanding Awards under the Plan shall terminate. However, all such Awards shall not terminate to the extent they are Assumed in connection with the Corporate Transaction.

(i)Corporate Transaction. Except as provided otherwise in an individual Award Agreement, in the event of a Corporate Transaction and:

(A) for the portion of each Award that is Assumed or Replaced, then such Award (if Assumed), the replacement Award (if Replaced), or the cash incentive program (if Replaced) automatically shall become fully vested, exercisable and payable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at Fair Market Value) for all of the Shares (or other consideration) at the time represented by such Assumed or Replaced portion of the Award, immediately upon termination of the Grantee’s Continuous Service if such Continuous Service is terminated by the successor company or the Company without Cause within twelve (12) months after the Corporate Transaction; and

(B) for the portion of each Award that is neither Assumed nor Replaced, such portion of the Award shall automatically become fully vested and exercisable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at Fair Market Value) for all of the Shares (or other consideration) at the time represented by such portion of the Award, immediately prior to the specified effective date of such Corporate Transaction, provided that the Grantee’s Continuous Service has not terminated prior to such date. For Awards that have an exercise feature, the portion of the Award that is not Assumed shall terminate under subsection (a) of this Section 11 to the extent not exercised prior to the consummation of such Corporate Transaction.

(ii)Change in Control. Except as provided otherwise in an individual Award Agreement, following a Change in Control (other than a Change in Control which also is a Corporate Transaction) and upon the termination of the Continuous Service of a Grantee if such Continuous Service is terminated by the Company or Related Entity without Cause within twelve (12) months after a Change in Control, each Award of such Grantee which is at the time outstanding under the Plan automatically shall become fully vested and exercisable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at Fair Market Value), immediately upon the termination of such Continuous Service.

(c)Effect of Acceleration on Incentive Stock Options. Any Incentive Stock Option accelerated under this Section 11 in connection with a Corporate Transaction or Change in Control shall remain exercisable as an Incentive Stock Option under the Code only to the extent the $100,000 dollar limitation of Section 422(d) of the Code is not exceeded.

12.Effective Date and Term of Plan. The Plan as amended and restated shall become effective upon its approval in 2012 by the shareholders of the Company. It shall continue in effect for a term of ten (10) years from such approval unless sooner terminated. Subject to Section 17, below, and Applicable Laws, Awards may be granted under the terms of the amended and restated Plan upon its becoming effective.

(a) The Board may at any time amend, suspend or terminate the Plan; provided, however, that no such amendment shall be made without the approval of the Company’s shareholders to the extent such approval is required by Applicable Laws,or if such amendment would lessen the shareholder approval requirements of Section 4(b)(vi) or this Section 13(a).

(b) No Award may be granted during any suspension of the Plan or after termination of the Plan.

(c) No suspension or termination of the Plan (including termination of the Plan under Section 11, above) shall adversely affect any rights under Awards already granted to a Grantee.

(a) The Company, during the term of the Plan, will at all times reserve and keep available such number of Shares as shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.

(b) The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.

15.No Effect on Terms of Employment/Consulting Relationship. The Plan shall not confer upon any Grantee any right with respect to the Grantee’s Continuous Service, nor shall it interfere in any way with his or her right or the right of the Company or any Related Entity to terminate the Grantee’s Continuous Service at any time, with or without Cause, including but not limited to Cause, and with or without notice. The ability of the Company or any Related Entity to terminate the employment of a Grantee who is employed at will is in no way affected by its determination that the Grantee’s Continuous Service has been terminated for Cause for the purposes of this Plan.

16.No Effect on Retirement and Other Benefit Plans. Except as specifically provided in a retirement or other benefit plan of the Company or a Related Entity, Awards shall not be deemed compensation for purposes of computing benefits or contributions under any retirement plan of the Company or a Related Entity, and shall not affect any benefits under any other benefit plan of any kind or any benefit plan subsequently instituted under which the availability or amount of benefits is related to level of compensation. The Plan is not a “Pension Plan” or “Welfare Plan” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

17.Shareholder Approval. The grant of Incentive Stock Options under the Plan shall be subject to approval by the shareholders of the Company within twelve (12) months before or after the date the Plan is adopted excluding Incentive Stock Options issued in substitution for outstanding Incentive Stock Options pursuant to Section 424(a) of the Code. Such shareholder approval shall be obtained in the degree and manner required under Applicable Laws. The Administrator may grant Incentive Stock Options under the Plan prior to approval by the shareholders, but until such approval is obtained, no such Incentive Stock Option shall be exercisable. In the event that shareholder approval is not obtained within the twelve (12) month period provided above, all Incentive Stock Options previously granted under the Plan shall be exercisable as Non-Qualified Stock Options.

18.Unfunded Obligation. Grantees shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Any amounts payable to Grantees pursuant to the Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured obligations for all purposes, including, without limitation, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Neither the Company nor any Related Entity shall be required to segregate any monies from its general

funds, or to create any trusts, or establish any special accounts with respect to such obligations. The Company shall retain at all times beneficial ownership of any investments, including trust investments, which the Company may make to fulfill its payment obligations hereunder. Any investments or the creation or maintenance of any trust or any Grantee account shall not create or constitute a trust or fiduciary relationship between the Administrator, the Company or any Related Entity and a Grantee, or otherwise create any vested or beneficial interest in any Grantee or the Grantee’s creditors in any assets of the Company or a Related Entity. The Grantees shall have no claim against the Company or any Related Entity for any changes in the value of any assets that may be invested or reinvested by the Company with respect to the Plan.

19.Construction. Captions and titles contained herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of the Plan. Except when otherwise indicated by the context, the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular. Use of the term “or” is not intended to be exclusive, unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

20. Nonexclusivity of the Plan. Neither the adoption of the Plan by the Board, the submission of the Plan to the shareholders of the Company for approval, nor any provision of the Plan will be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board to adopt such additional compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable, including, without limitation, the granting of Awards otherwise than under the Plan, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.

21.Plan History. The Plan was originally adopted on March 9, 2007. The Plan was amended and restated effective June 4, 2009, subject to shareholder approval, in order to increase the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards under the Plan and to decrease the maximum term of Awards which may be issued under the Plan. The Plan was further amended and restated effective June 6, 2012, subject to shareholder approval, in order to increase the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards under the Plan, to add performance criteria, to permit the use under the Plan of Shares withheld to pay tax on awards other than Options and SARs, to extend the term of the Plan to ten (10) years from June 6, 2012, and to make certain other nonsubstantive changes.

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. 3 A Proposals — The Board of Directors re commends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals No. 2 and No. 3 and 1 YEAR on Proposal No. 4. 1. Election of Directors*: For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold + 01 - William J. Dawson 02 - Robert C. Hood 03 - Dennis C. Kakures 04 - Robert P. McGrath 05 - Dennis P. Stradford 06 - Ronald H. Zech * Each to be elected and to serve until the 2012 annual meeting of 07 - M. Richard Smith shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified. For Against Abstain 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs Abstain 2. To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the 4. To recommend, by advisory, non-binding vote, the independent auditors for the Company for the year ending frequency of votes on compensation of named December 31, 2011. executive officers. 3. To approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation of named executive officers . B Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print new address below. C Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below q

Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. C 1234567890 J N T 1 U P X 1 1 4 9 2 6 1 01BOTB

~~3 PLEASE~~q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. 3 Proxy — McGrath RentCorp The Board of Directors solicits this Proxy for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Wednesday, June 8, 2011, at 2:0 0 p.m. (PDT), at McGrath RentCorp’s corporate offices and Northern California sales & inventory center at 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore , CA 94551. The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Randle F. Rose and Keith E. Pratt, or each of them, with full power of substitution and revocation, attorneys and proxies of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Share holders of McGrath Rent Corp or any adjournments thereof, and to vote, including the right to cumulate votes (if cumulative voting is required), the shares of Common Stock of McGrath Rent Corp registered in the name of the undersigned on the Record Date for the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the nominees named on the re verse side and FOR Proposals No. 2 and No. 3 and 1 YEAR on Proposal No. 4. The shares represented by this Proxy will be voted as directed on the rev erseside; if no specification is made, the shares will be voted FOR said nominees, FOR Proposals No. 2 and No. 3 and for 1 YEAR on Proposal No. 4. The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting to the extent authorized by Rule 14a-4(c) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Proxy Statement and the 2010 Annual Report to Share holders furnished with this Proxy. PLEASE RETURN THIS SIGNED AND DATED PROXY IN THE ACCOMPANYING ADDRESSED ENVELOPEq


McGrath RentCorp
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x		No fee required.


Name	Age		Position Held with the Company

Dennis C. Kakures		5455	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Joseph F. Hanna		4849	Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Keith E. Pratt		4849	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Randle F. Rose		5354	Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary

David M. Whitney		4647	Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller

Kay Dashner		5253	Vice President, Human Resources

~~Richard G. Brown~~Philip B. Hawkins		4236	Vice President, Mobile Modular

~~Philip B. Hawkins~~John P. Skenesky		3545	Vice President, TRS-RenTelco

Kristina VanTrease		4142	Vice President, Portable Storage

Steven H. Adler		5253	President, Adler Tank Rentals

William J. Dawson(1)(2)		5657	Director

Robert C. Hood(1)(2)		7071	Director

Robert P. McGrath(2)(3)		7778	Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Directors

M. Richard Smith(1)(3)		6364	Director

Dennis P. Stradford(1)(3)		6465	Director

Ronald H. Zech(2)(3)		6768	Chairman of the Board of Directors


~~Aaron Rents Inc.~~	~~Aircastle LTD~~	~~Affymetrix~~

~~Ariba~~	~~Blue Coat Systems~~	~~Dionex Corp.~~

~~Electro Rent Corp~~	~~ePlus, Inc.~~	~~Financial Federal Corp~~

~~Finisar~~	~~FormFactor~~	~~GATX Corp~~

~~Infinera~~	~~Informatica~~	~~IXYS~~

~~Marlin Business Services~~	~~Micrel, Inc.~~	~~Mobile Mini Inc.~~

~~Modtech Holdings Inc.~~	~~Solera Holdings~~	~~Synaptics~~

~~TAL International Group, Inc.~~	~~Tibco Software~~	~~VeriFone Holdings~~

~~Willis Lease Finance Corp~~	~~Wind River Systems~~	~~Zoran~~


Aircastle LTD.	Allis-Chalmers Energy, Inc.	Applied Signal Technology, Inc.

Blue Coat Systems, Inc.	California Water Service Company	Coherent, Inc.

Dril-Quip, Inc.	Electro Rent Corp.	Exponent, Inc.

Financial Federal Corp.	IGATE Corp.	Micrel, Inc.

Mobile Mini Inc.	Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.	Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc.

Power Integrations, Inc.	Synaptics, Inc.	TAL International Group, Inc.

Tessera Technologies	San Jose Water Company	SonicWALL, Inc.

Willis Lease Finance Corp.


(a)	(b)		(c)		(d)		(e)		(f)		(g)		(h)		(i)		(j)
Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		Option Awards ($)(1)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)(3)		Total ($)
Dennis C. Kakures President and Chief Executive Officer		2011 2010 2009	$ $ $	470,000 450,000 450,000		— — —	$ $	369,468 310,960 —	$ $ $	361,276 296,496 570,860	$ $ $	554,907 321,048 160,271		— — —	$ $ $	7,350 0 7,350	$ $ $	1,763,001 1,378,504 1,188,481

Joseph F. Hanna Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer		2011 2010 2009	$ $ $	310,000 300,000 300,000		— — —	$ $	176,337 167,440 —	$ $ $	170,658 156,484 273,700	$ $ $	336,038 196,673 101,046		— — —	$ $ $	7,350 0 7,350	$ $ $	1,000,383 820,597 682,096

Keith E. Pratt Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2011 2010 2009	$ $ $	320,000 310,000 310,000		— — —	$ $	176,337 167,440 —	$ $ $	170,658 156,484 273,700	$ $ $	316,420 200,044 103,063		— — —	$ $ $	7,350 0 7,350	$ $ $	990,765 833,968 694,113

Randle F. Rose Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary		2011 2010 2009	$ $ $	240,000 220,000 220,000		— — —	$ $	83,970 71,760 —	$ $ $	82,834 65,888 109,480	$ $ $	154,543 95,568 71,924		— — —	$ $ $	7,350 0 7,350	$ $ $	568,697 453,216 408,754

Philip B. Hawkins Vice President and Division Manager, Mobile Modular		2011 2010 2009	$ $ $	196,250 173,654 175,000		— — —	$ $	83,970 71,760 —	$ $ $	82,834 82,360 140,760	$ $ $	191,404 96,215 21,494		— — —	$ $ $	7,350 0 7,350	$ $ $	561,808 423,989 344,604


¨		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))


¨		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-11(c) or §240.14a-12


¨		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.


		(1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


		(2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


		(3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):


¨		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.


			Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(3)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
Name	Grant Date		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)
Dennis C. Kakures		12/10/09	$	6,750	$	236,250	$	396,563		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		02/26/10		—		—		—		1,300		13,000		26,000		—		36,000	$	23.92	$	296,496

Keith E. Pratt		12/10/09	$	4,069	$	139,500	$	235,406		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		02/26/10		—		—		—		700		7,000		14,000		—		19,000	$	23.92	$	156,484

Joseph F. Hanna		12/10/09	$	3,938	$	146,250	$	241,875		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		02/26/10		—		—		—		700		7,000		14,000		—		19,000	$	23.92	$	156,484

Randle F. Rose		12/10/09	$	825	$	82,500	$	115,500		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		02/26/10		—		—		—		300		3,000		6,000		—		8,000	$	23.92	$	65,888

Philip B. Hawkins		12/10/09	$	1,641	$	65,625	$	106,641		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		02/26/10		—		—		—		300		3,000		6,000		—		10,000	$	23.92	$	82,360


	Option Awards(1)									Stock Awards(2)
	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Name	Exercisable		Unexercisable
Dennis C. Kakures		35,000		0		$	15.01		03/10/2014		—		—		—		—
		110,000		0		$	22.18		01/14/2015		—		—		—		—
		85,500		4,500		$	29.56		01/20/2016		—		—		—		—
		86,250		28,750		$	31.14		02/26/2014		—		—		—		—
		106,700		87,300		$	20.71		02/25/2015		—		—		—		—
		51,100		94,900		$	15.62		02/27/2016		—		—		—		—
		0		36,000		$	23.92		02/26/2017		—		—		13,000	$	340,860

Keith E. Pratt		76,000		4,000		$	29.56		01/20/2016		—		—		—		—
		37,500		12,500		$	31.14		02/26/2014		—		—		—		—
		49,500		40,500		$	20.71		02/25/2015		—		—		—		—
		0		45,500		$	15.62		02/27/2016		—		—		—		—
		0		19,000		$	23.92		02/26/2017		—		—		7,000	$	183,540

Joseph F. Hanna		31,125		7,875		$	11.80		01/15/2013		—		—		—		—
		18,000		0		$	11.74		03/20/2013		—		—		—		—
		34,000		0		$	15.29		03/08/2014		—		—		—		—
		40,000		0		$	22.18		01/14/2015		—		—		—		—
		33,250		1,750		$	29.56		01/20/2016		—		—		—		—
		26,250		8,750		$	31.14		02/26/2014		—		—		—		—
		49,500		40,500		$	20.71		02/25/2015		—		—		—		—
		24,500		45,500		$	15.62		02/27/2016		—		—		—		—
		0		19,000		$	23.92		02/26/2017		—		—		7,000	$	183,540

Randle F. Rose		19,000		1,000		$	29.56		01/20/2016		—		—		—		—
		15,000		5,000		$	31.14		02/26/2014		—		—		—		—
		0		16,200		$	20.71		02/25/2015		—		—		—		—
		0		18,200		$	15.62		02/27/2016		—		—		—		—
		0		8,000		$	23.92		02/26/2017		—		—		3,000	$	78,660

Philip B. Hawkins		12,350		650		$	29.56		01/20/2016		—		—		—		—
		9,750		3,250		$	31.14		02/26/2014		—		—		—		—
		0		16,650		$	20.71		02/25/2015		—		—		—		—
		0		23,400		$	15.62		02/27/2016		—		—		—		—
		0		10,000		$	23.92		02/26/2017		—		—		3,000	$	78,660


Beneficial Owner(1)(2)	Shares Beneficially Owned(3)		Percentage of Class of Shares Beneficially Owned
Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC(4) 227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		3,162,518		13.0	%
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(5) 100 E. Pratt Street Baltimore, MD 21202		3,097,320		12.7	%
BlackRock, Inc. (6) 40 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022		1,370,261		5.6	%
Robert P. McGrath(7)(8)		1,392,983		5.7	%
Dennis C. Kakures(8)(9)		853,250		3.4	%
Joseph Hanna(8)(9)		287,303		1.2	%
Keith E. Pratt(8)(9)		193,349		*
Ronald H. Zech(8)		110,000		*
William J. Dawson(8)		93,000		*
Dennis P. Stradford(8)		85,000		*
Randle F. Rose(8)(9)		50,628		*
Robert C. Hood(8)		40,000		*
Philip B. Hawkins (8)(9)		31,647		*
All executive officers and directors as a group (16 persons)(10)		3,502,199		13.4	%


¨		Definitive Additional Materials


		(1)		Amount previously paid:


		(2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:


Name and Position	Restricted Stock Units		SARs		Stock Options
Dennis C. Kakures (Chief Executive Officer, President and Director)		13,200		36,200		—
Joseph F. Hanna (Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer)		6,300		17,100		—
Keith E. Pratt (Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)		6,300		17,100		—
Randle F. Rose (Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary)		3,000		8,300		—
Philip B. Hawkins (Vice President, Mobile Modular)		3,000		8,300		—
Executive Officer Group (5 persons)		19,400		23,300		—
Non-Executive Director Group (6 persons)		13,800		—		—
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group (24 persons)		54,200		42,000		—


A	Proposals —	The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR all the nominees listed andFOR Proposals No. 2, No. 3
		and No. 4.


		C		Authorized Signatures —		This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below



		Proxy — McGrath RentCorp


		The Board of Directors solicits this Proxy for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Wednesday, June 6, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. (PDT) at McGrath RentCorp’s principal executive offices at 5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, CA 94551 The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Randle F. Rose and Keith E. Pratt, or each of them, with full power of substitution and revocation, attorneys and proxies of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of McGrath RentCorp or any adjournments thereof, and to vote, including the right to cumulate votes (if cumulative voting is required), the shares of Common Stock of McGrath RentCorp registered in the name of the undersigned on the Record Date for the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the nominees named on the reverse side and FOR Proposals No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4. The shares represented by this Proxy will be voted as directed on the reverse side;if no specification is made, the shares will be voted FOR said nominees and proposals.The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting to the extent authorized by Rule 14a-4(c) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Proxy Statement and the 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders furnished with this Proxy. PLEASE RETURN THIS SIGNED AND DATED PROXY IN THE ACCOMPANYING ADDRESSED ENVELOPE